ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:08:33 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=PR6fZ5TczwKEc7WNRSn7DMMcdMVxl6KK+gj23YrH4T4=; b=Woxy/8nwzREltzszVg/ghbCZvg96qsBVXXuiMDj5lSqXFsjF4NkVZLGPY3l9OLtK8M/aO3DE1FBMvHkt3vSj3L7mvQ1aR6Kquq0MbQXZrzUuwFs0AewuB2/11E5yN06onlqQ88xjJq23AGw1c6qFSP8dp2EPM8477QVU7/BHK/g=
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
  • Thread-index: AQHRRzQRZVydEltfz0eHv1qqWTFcZQ==
  • Thread-topic: Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report

Colleagues -

Attached and copied below, please find a Motion for consideration during our 
special session on 14 JAN to consider the Recommendations contained in the 
Third Draft CCWG-Accountability report.  The small sub team reviewing comments 
submitted by SGs and Cs met today, and finalization of the findings/comments 
contained in the motion will be completed between now and our meeting.

Please note that on todays call we also raised the possibility that a GNSO 
response might be more informal (e.g., letter) rather than a formal motion.  
This will also be part of our discussion on the 14th, but I wanted to have the 
motion submitted to the list in the event that we choose this approach.

Thanks—

J.

________________________________

 Motion on GNSO Joint Position on CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

Whereas,


1.     The GNSO Council, together with other ICANN Supporting Organizations and 
Advisory Committees, chartered the Cross-Community Working Group on Enhancing 
ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) on 13 November 2014 ‘to deliver 
proposals that would enhance ICANN’s accountability towards all stakeholders.

2.     The CCWG-Accountability published its third draft proposal for public 
comment on 30 November 2015 (see 
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-2015-11-30-en).

3.     All GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and/or Constituencies (Cs) submitted 
their input on the third draft proposal and its 12 recommendations.

4.     A GNSO Council sub-team was formed to review the input submitted by the 
GNSO SG/Cs and make a recommendation to the GNSO Council concerning a possible 
joint GNSO position on the third draft proposal .

5.     The GNSO Council has reviewed the input provided by the sub-team on the 
CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal.

Resolved,


1.     The GNSO Council views on the recommendations contained in the 
CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal are as follows:

Recommendation #1

Establishing An Empowered Community For Enforcing Community Powers for more 
information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #2

Empowering The Community Through Consensus: Engage, Escalate, Enforce for more 
information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #3

Redefining ICANN’s Bylaws As ‘Standard Bylaws’ And ‘Fundamental Bylaws’ for 
more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #4

Ensuring Community Involvement In ICANN Decision-Making: Seven New Community 
Powers for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #5

Changing Aspects Of ICANN's Mission, Commitments And Core Values for more 
information)

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #6

Reaffirming ICANN's Commitment to Respect Internationally Recognized Human 
Rights as it Carries Out Its Mission for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #7

Strengthening ICANN's Independent Review Process for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #8

Improving ICANN's Request For Reconsideration Process for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #9

Incorporation of the Affirmation of Commitments for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #10

Enhancing the Accountability of Supporting Organizations and Advisory 
Committees for more information

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #11

Board obligations regarding GAC Advice

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments




Recommendation #12

Committing to further accountability work in Work Stream 2

GNSO Council Support

General Support / Limited Support with some opposition / No support

Comments





2.     The GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Secretariat to share this GNSO 
Council input on the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal with the Chairs 
of the CCWG-Accountability as soon as possible.

3.     Although this GNSO input is submitted after the close of the public 
comment period, the GNSO Council expects the CCWG-Accountability to give this 
input due consideration as it is the aggregation of the individual GNSO SG/C 
positions that were submitted before the deadline.

4.     The GNSO Council appreciates all the efforts of the CCWG-Accountability 
to deliver its final proposal to the Chartering Organizations in a timely 
manner and looks forward to considering the final proposal in due time.


Attachment: Motion on CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal - revised 4 January 2016.docx
Description: Motion on CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal - revised 4 January 2016.docx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>