<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Process for endorsement of candidates.
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Process for endorsement of candidates.
- From: Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:03:11 -0500
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=admin.mail.utoronto.ca; s=selector1-mail-utoronto-ca; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=8x8h/oE3BGLbwP71YHaitDJBFe9r1LbQQYs+rS1KGKs=; b=KKnEVq6mZDDdDLhO1NNdYwAMHfMY8cBZWL8p+IYHz2CtZkcsLZpj0npC41k6Qwy0C7VzKADQSo88trRyebWcg1L4yklI/slls79obB3pQUFXcYes6RChdO/v0kCS+VPg0wt5L0FWLupiwqL4QAs/RUVlAA6D2gDcF8FSMK0ckjE=
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
Like Ed, I am confused about the process that we are following for
endorsement of candidates. In the interests of ensuring that one of the
most qualified consumer advocates gets endorsed, I am hereby, in my own
name, endorsing Jeremy Malcolm. Rather than attempt to sort this out
now, I feel it important to stress again that we need to select a broad
range of skills and geographic awareness in our selection, and Jeremy
excels as a consumer advocate.
Kind regards,
Stephanie Perrin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|