Re: [council] ISPCP Endorsement Candidates for CCT-RT

[Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@xxxxxx>]

It would be helpful if CSG provided the SG list of 3 before the council 
meeting... 


Rubens

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 8:46 PM, Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> No, those are just ISPCP endorsements. CSG needs to coalesce. 
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
> 
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
> Virtualaw LLC
> 1155 F Street, NW. Suite 1050
> Washington, DC 20004
> 202-559-8597/Direct
> 202-559-8750/Fax
> 202-255-6172/Cell
> Twitter: @VLawDC
> 
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
> From: Edward Morris
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 5:27 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; WUKnoben
> Reply To: egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: re: [council] ISPCP Endorsement Candidates for CCT-RT
> 
> Hi Wolf-Ulrich,
>  
> Can I assume these three names are being submitted on behalf of the entire 
> Commercial Stakeholder Group? My understanding is that in accordance with the 
> GNSO governing structure each SG, not Constituency,  was to nominate between 
> 0-3 applicants. 
>  
> We are still deliberating our selections amongst many fine applicants from 
> the NonCommercial Stakeholders Group and look forward to communicating our 
> decision to everyone prior to tomorrow's meeting.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Ed Morris
>  
> From: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:37 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] ISPCP Endorsement Candidates for CCT-RT
>  
> All,
>  
> the ISPCP constituency is in support for endorsement of the following 
> candidates to the CCT-RT:
> Carlos Gutierrez
> Jonathan Zuck
> Waudo Siganga
>  
> We’re open to a discussion for finding the appropriate GNSO representation on 
> this review team.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
>  
>  
> From: Drazek, Keith <mailto:kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 6:38 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [council] RySG Endorsement Candidates for CCT-RT
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> The RySG respectfully submits the following 3 candidates for endorsement:
>  
> ·         Jeff Neuman
> ·         Jordyn Buchanan
> ·         Nacho Amadoz
>  
> Thanks and regards,
> Keith
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of James M. Bladel
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 12:28 PM
> To: Jennifer Gore Standiford; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Re: RrSG endorsement announcement 
>  
> Acknowledged, Jennifer.  Thank you.
>  
> J.
>  
> From: Jennifer Standiford <JStandiford@xxxxxxx <mailto:JStandiford@xxxxxxx>>
> Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 11:18
> To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: RrSG endorsement announcement 
>  
> James and Council Members, 
>  
> The Registrar Stakeholder Group would like to support the endorsement of the 
> following three (3) candidates for the CCT Review Team.
> ?         Calvin Brown
> ?         Gregory DiBiase
> ?         Ben Anderson
>  
> Thank you,
> Jennifer 
>  
> Jennifer Gore Standiford
> Senior Policy Director
> Web.com 
> 12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West  |  Jacksonville, FL 32258
> Office: 904. 680-6919| Cell: 904. 401-4347
> <image001.png>
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] 
> On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 3:31 PM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: Fwd: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement 
> Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER
>  
> Hi folks -
>  
> Just a reminder to please take a look at the revised CCT-RT endorsement 
> process (attached), and let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  
> Ideally, we should get this finalized in the next day or so to allow the SGs 
> to meet & discuss their slate of candidates seeking endorsement.  FOr those 
> on the go, the key points are: (a) increasing the GNSO delegation to 8-10, 
> and (b) tasking each SG to submit 0-2 candidates for endorsement.
>  
> Marika has reached out to her counterpart(s) and asked each candidate to 
> respond to the GNSO-specific questions, with candidates given until 7 DEC to 
> respond.
> 
> 
> Thank you, 
>  
> J.
> ____________
> James Bladel
> GoDaddy
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: November 24, 2015 at 18:48:05 CST
> To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, "McGrady, Paul D." 
> <PMcGrady@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:PMcGrady@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, Volker Greimann 
> <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, Stephanie 
> Perrin <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement 
> Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER
> 
> Colleagues -
>  
> Getting caught up on on this thread (in reverse order!) and agree with key 
> points raised by Paul, Wolf & Volker.   I concur with Wolf-Ulrich that we 
> should shorten the list to preserve the weight & value of GNSO endorsement, 
> but to Paul’s point, having a slate of 4 candidates may have covered previous 
> RTs, but will not provide sufficient coverage/balance here, as the CCT-RT 
> disproportionately results from, and affects, the GNSO Community.  Off the 
> cuff, the right number of candidates is probably 8-10, which would make this 
> RT a bit larger than usual, with the GNSO delegation its largest component.
>  
> I agree with Marika’s suggestion to reach out to candidates seeking GNSO 
> endorsement and ask them to specifically address the GNSO criteria, and that 
> we also ask our Liaisons to provide some insights on how the ALAC and ccNSO 
> are selecting their candidates.  
>  
> I think the draft process and timeline that Wolf posted on 21 NOV (attached 
> here) is generally hitting the right deliverables, but I think we need an 
> extra couple of days to to finalize the process and allow candidates to 
> respond to Marika’s request.  We can then proceed to ask the SGs for their 
> endorsed candidates.
>  
> With that in mind, please take a look at the draft process (attached),  and 
> respond as soon as possible (but definitively by Monday 30 NOV) if they have 
> any concerns/objections/edits? 
>  
> Thanks—
>  
> J.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 14:13
> To: "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:PMcGrady@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
> Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, Stephanie Perrin 
> <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement 
> Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER
>  
> I understand the concerns, in particular since no limit has been preset with 
> respect to the review team membership.
>  
> Can our liaisons – Olivier for ALAC and Patrick for ccNSO – disclose how 
> their respective SO is dealing with the question? From the published list of 
> applications – maybe it’s not the most recent one - I count 9 ALAC, 3 ccNSO, 
> 3 GAC, 27 GNSO and 31 Independent. So “dozens” could just come from the GNSO.
> Limitation seems to me necessary to let the GNSO appear being credible. And 
> we should avoid discussions between our groups about which applicant may be 
> more appropriate in comparison to others. The SGs/constituencies should be 
> given the right to handle this.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> From: Stephanie Perrin <mailto:stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:24 PM
> To:McGrady, Paul D. <mailto:PMcGrady@xxxxxxxxxxx> ; Volker Greimann 
> <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ; WUKnoben 
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> ; Bladel James 
> <mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:GNSO Council List <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement 
> Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER
>  
> I share this concern.  This is a very important Review, covering a range of 
> topics.  I don't see that many candidates who have expertise in all required 
> areas, which is not surprising.  We need to make sure we have enough people, 
> to ensure balance across a range of factors, and that the representation of 
> interests is fair.  Seems more like 2 per SG to me.
> Stephanie Perrin
> 
> On 2015-11-24 9:58, McGrady, Paul D. wrote:
> Thanks Volker.  Do we have any information on how many other AC’s and SO’s 
> are endorsing?  What I don’t want to see happen is that we put up 4 everyone 
> else puts up dozens and we end up with 1 in the final result.  Without 
> information on how many everyone else may endorse, I don’t see how we can be 
> confident that our self-limitation will have its intended affect.  Do we know 
> what everyone else is doing?
>  
> Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
>  
> Best,
> Paul
>  
>  
> Paul D. McGrady Jr.
> Partner
> Chair, Trademark, Domain Names and Brand Enforcement Practice
> Winston & Strawn LLP
> 35 W. Wacker Drive
> Chicago, IL 60601-9703
> D: +1 (312) 558-5963
> F: +1 (312) 558-5700
> Bio <http://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/mcgrady-paul-d.html> | 
> VCard <http://www.winston.com/vcards/996.vcf> | Email 
> <mailto:pmcgrady@xxxxxxxxxxx> | winston.com <http://www.winston.com/>
> 
>  
>  
> From: Volker Greimann [mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:55 AM
> To: McGrady, Paul D.; WUKnoben; Bladel James
> Cc: GNSO Council List
> Subject: Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement 
> Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER
>  
> I think if we cast too broad a net and recommend too many candidates, the 
> recommendation of the council will lose its punch. By focussing on a limited 
> number of candidates, we truly endorse them.
> 
> Having one candidate from each SG makes sense as it ensures all SGs are 
> represented.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Volker
> 
> Am 24.11.2015 um 15:44 schrieb McGrady, Paul D.:
> Thanks Wolf-Ulrich.  I’d like to understand why we would limit our 
> nominations to just one applicant per Stakeholder group for a total of 4 from 
> the GNSO.  Are the other SOs and ACs adopting the same limitations?  Is this 
> an ICANN requirement?  It seems to me that the GNSO will be 
> disproportionately affected by the outcomes of the CCT Review, so unless 
> self-limiting is required, I guess I don’t see the upside and would prefer to 
> endorse as many candidates as possible and just have the various groups lobby 
> one level up for their people.  Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this!
>  
> Best,
> Paul
>  
>  
> Paul D. McGrady Jr.
> Partner
> Chair, Trademark, Domain Names and Brand Enforcement Practice
> Winston & Strawn LLP
> 35 W. Wacker Drive
> Chicago, IL 60601-9703
> D: +1 (312) 558-5963
> F: +1 (312) 558-5700
> Bio <http://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/mcgrady-paul-d.html> | 
> VCard <http://www.winston.com/vcards/996.vcf> | Email 
> <mailto:pmcgrady@xxxxxxxxxxx> | winston.com <http://www.winston.com/>
> 
>  
>  
> From:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] 
> On Behalf Of WUKnoben
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:20 AM
> To: Bladel James
> Cc: GNSO Council List
> Subject: Fw: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement 
> Process - DUE 17 DECEMBER
>  
> Hi James,
>  
> by picking this up: could you please make reference to my email from 21 Nov 
> with respect to the process? As time is short – and Thanksgiving is close – I 
> wonder whether the council agrees to the process suggested.
>  
> I’ve already alerted the CSG and am confident to receive some input.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> From: Marika Konings <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:22 AM
> To: Council <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - 
> DUE 17 DECEMBER
>  
> For your information. 
>  
> From: <soac-infoalert-bounces@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:soac-infoalert-bounces@xxxxxxxxx>> on behalf of Charla Shambley 
> <charla.shambley@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:charla.shambley@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Monday 23 November 2015 20:01
> To: "mailto:%27soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:%27soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>'" <soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc: Eleeza Agopian <eleeza.agopian@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:eleeza.agopian@xxxxxxxxx>>, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [Soac-infoalert] CCT Review Team Endorsement Process - DUE 17 
> DECEMBER
>  
> Dear SO/AC leaders,
>  
> We are pleased to report that we received 72 applications from individuals 
> interested in serving on the next review team under the Affirmation of 
> Commitments (AoC) that will examine the impact of new gTLDS in the areas of 
> competition, consumer trust and consumer choice (CCT).  Before final 
> selection of the CCT Review Team is completed by the ICANN CEO and the GAC 
> Chair,  we are seeking endorsements from any SO/AC for those applicants 
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/aoc/cct/applications> who have 
> expressed an interest to serve as their representatives. 
>  
> If you choose to endorse an applicant, please send your endorsements by email 
> to reviews@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:reviews@xxxxxxxxx> by  the updated deadline of 
> 17 December at 23:59 UTC.    
>  
> In order to help with the endorsement process, below are answers to some 
> frequently asked questions:
>  
> Is there a set allocation for SO/AC representatives?  Under the AoC, there is 
> no set allocation per SO/AC or per stakeholder group, nor is there a maximum 
> for total size of the review team.  
>  
> How Many Members Will be on the Review Team?  There is no set number of 
> volunteers for the Review Team.  However, keep in mind that the review team 
> should be comprised of members that collectively have  expertise covering the 
> wide range of topics that are within the mandate of this review team.   Past 
> AoC review teams were comprised of approximately 16 members.
>  
> What Were the Criteria for Applicants?  The call for volunteers 
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/call-volunteers-cct-rt-2015-10-01-en> 
> lists the criteria that we were looking for.  The composition should be based 
> on several factors, including:
>  
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Subject matter expertise –
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->New gTLD application 
> process/objections
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Intellectual Property 
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Security & Malicious Abuse of the 
> DNS
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Competition Issues
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Consumer Protection
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Public Policy Concerns 
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->o   <!--[endif]-->Trust in the DNS
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Representation across the 
> interested SO/ACs
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Diversity
> <!--[if !supportLists]-->·         <!--[endif]-->Regional representation
>  
> For more information, please see:  
> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-11-16-en 
> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-11-16-en>.
> 
> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, 
> if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading 
> it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable 
> privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of 
> the author.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
>  
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>  
> Volker A. Greimann
> - Rechtsabteilung -
>  
> Key-Systems GmbH
> Im Oberen Werk 1
> 66386 St. Ingbert
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  
> Web: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net/> / www.RRPproxy.net 
> <http://www.rrpproxy.net/>
> www.domaindiscount24.com <http://www.domaindiscount24.com/> / 
> www.BrandShelter.com <http://www.brandshelter.com/>
>  
> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> www.facebook.com/KeySystems <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>
> www.twitter.com/key_systems <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
>  
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken 
> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
>  
> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu/> 
>  
> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen 
> Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder 
> Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese 
> Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per 
> E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
>  
> --------------------------------------------
>  
> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Volker A. Greimann
> - legal department -
>  
> Key-Systems GmbH
> Im Oberen Werk 1
> 66386 St. Ingbert
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  
> Web: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net/> / www.RRPproxy.net 
> <http://www.rrpproxy.net/>
> www.domaindiscount24.com <http://www.domaindiscount24.com/> / 
> www.BrandShelter.com <http://www.brandshelter.com/>
>  
> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
> www.facebook.com/KeySystems <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>
> www.twitter.com/key_systems <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
>  
> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken 
> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
>  
> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu/> 
>  
> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is 
> addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
> email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
> addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify 
> the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
>  
>  
>  
> 
> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, 
> if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading 
> it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable 
> privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of 
> the author. 
>  
>  <>No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>
> Version: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4477/11098 - Release Date: 12/01/15
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>