Re: [council] RE: Taking the Council's Temperature on Procedures for Consideration of 3rd Accountability Proposal

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi folks -

Just a reminder that the 17 DEC GNSO Council meeting will have a slot on the 
agenda to discuss any high-level concerns/red flags raised by any SGs.  This is 
not the last opportunity for individuals or SGs to weigh in on these 
recommendations.  But we should have a clearer sense of whether or not there 
are any signifiant outstanding issues.  And a reminder that we have planned two 
additional meeting times planned (14 JAN and 21 JAN) for the final review & 
vote to adopt the the report.

It is my hope that all SG concerns will be raised/expressed by then, if not 
sooner.  However, I should point out that due to external time constraints, we 
cannot entertain any requests for deferrals if the vote takes place in January.

Thanks—

J.

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Keith Drazek <kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday, December 4, 2015 at 11:40
To: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, GNSO Council List 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] RE: Taking the Council's Temperature on Procedures for 
Consideration of 3rd Accountability Proposal

Thanks Phil.

The RySG is working now to develop its comments and position statements on the 
CCWG Proposal. I expect they will be completed prior to our next call on 
December 17.

Regards,
Keith

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Corwin
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 1:29 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Taking the Council's Temperature on Procedures for 
Consideration of 3rd Accountability Proposal

Fellow Councilors:

This morning the BC held its regular members’ call, and we got into some 
discussion in regard to background information I had circulated prior to the 
call (below). However, there was insufficient participation to reach a BC 
consensus, and we shall continue the discussion on the BC email list.

It was decided on the call that I would reach out to other Councilors to get an 
initial impression of whether we are aiming to discuss and vote on a Resolution 
of approval or disapproval in two weeks, on our call of December 17th, or 
whether we wish to bring that question to a vote on our first call of January 
2016.

If we are targeting the 17th then we have a great deal of work to do, including 
getting consensus feedback from those we represent and preparing a draft 
Resolution. If we are looking toward January then I would strongly suggest that 
we schedule that call for January 14th, and not the 21st which is only one day 
prior to the target delivery date to the Board.

What are your views on this most important matter?

Very best regards,
Philip




*******************************
BC members, please note that the second item in item #2, following Steve’s 
review of the Policy calendar, is:
·         Discussion of final Accountability proposal #3– Comments close 
December 21- procedure for BC input into CSG, and then GNSO, for Chartering 
Organization decision

The third Accountability proposal was published on Monday, November 30 for a 
comment period closing on December 21. The target date for delivering the 
Proposal to the Board for its consideration is January 22, 2016.

While public comment is being solicited, we are now at the stage where the 
primary objective is to get the Chartering Organizations to indicate whether 
they approve or disapprove of the Proposal – and, if they disapprove, what 
changes would be required for approval.

The GNSO is the relevant Chartering organization for the BC. The next meeting 
of the GNSO Council is scheduled for December 17, two weeks from today and four 
days before the close of the public comment period. Susan and I will be looking 
to BC members to provide a consensus view of the proposal that we can convey to 
the rest of the CSG, as well as the NCSG and the full Council.

The first meeting of the Council in 2016 will be held on either January 14 or 
21. If Council does not approve a Resolution of approval or disapproval on 
December 17 then I think it is a sure bet that the next call will be on January 
14, eight days prior to the scheduled Board delivery date.

With all of that as background, the guidance your Councilors are looking for on 
today’s call is whether BC members believe they will be able to convey a 
consensus view on the proposal prior to the December 17 Council meeting, or 
whether we should be targeting January 14 for that Council decision. If you are 
planning to be on today’s call please be prepared to share your view on that 
question, and if you are not on the call please provide your view on the 
BC-Private list.



Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey