ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Final Issue Report on a Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service to replace WHOIS and Motion

  • To: "avri@xxxxxxx" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Final Issue Report on a Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service to replace WHOIS and Motion
  • From: Susan Kawaguchi <susank@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:29:57 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fb.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=facebook; bh=JeioYJfCMR6yAEzDMyLAzMbfk39tn8icTehzC5JjTwk=; b=pwrOtqKUdsFHqUl/8iDGox8kFw42UphpGxBd4CTyG596ZYxWhd8b9vcM3+isDZv9nBG+ kpNUxnJit/PwrrLzXQLFXLjTOC+2uzrX6PZKgfPN8e9hIB8XGmlldYing8uwuXFvX8HO AT1FbaJnQV9wcTDY145PlQ67omrnG7gCZnI=
  • In-reply-to: <561AAFD2.7020103@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D23FF44F.BC046%skawaguchi@fb.com> <561AAFD2.7020103@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHRBFBNIQ98P2KeDkGa9Vy0u38DEJ5nGIwAgAAKmQA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] Final Issue Report on a Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service to replace WHOIS and Motion
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821
Hi Avri, 

I thought there were concerns but I am wondering if it is possible for you
to propose the amendments as part of the motion?

Or do you feel that the revisions are substantial and we would require a
drafting team?  

Best, 



Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.
 
Phone - 650 485-6064






On 10/11/15, 11:52 AM, "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Avri
Doria" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>Hi,
>
>I believe the charter needs to be amended.
>
>The issue of Rights Impact analysis.
>
>The NCSG suggested one after each stage.
>INTA, I believe, suggested that it not happen until after Stage 2.
>
>However, it does not show up after any stage in the charter.
>
>I believe this is just one issue that needs to be discussed about the
>charter. I believe that this charter needs to be discussed before we
>kick of the work.  It is pretty good, but it needs fine tuning.
>
>avri
>
>
>On 11-Oct-15 14:11, Susan Kawaguchi wrote:
>> Hello All, 
>>
>>  Attached is a motion for the adoption of the PDP-WG charter for the
>> Final Issue Report on a Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory
>> Service to replace WHOIS.
>>
>> There has been some concern with  the charter for this PDP-WG be and
>> it be given additional consideration and revisions.
>>
>> Please consider the motion and second if you agree the charter does
>> not require revising.
>>
>> Best, 
>>
>> Susan Kawaguchi
>>
>> Domain Name Manager
>>
>> Facebook Legal Dept.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Phone - 650 485-6064
>>
>
>
>---
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=cjstkpAuvAi4gqeqX5O18A%3D%3D%0A&m=I5Y
>skMS10vecTQWyeJ8BujUfwa4F91MzddRD4eJSYFI%3D%0A&s=228dc4a256736deff32b2ac37
>5c07bdebd42605443d903064608ac47b3eda3af
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>