RE: [council] GNSO Council Comment on FY16 Draft Budget and Operating Plan

["Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Amr & Colleagues,

Thank-you for stepping up and preparing this work. 

I propose to review and make a final editorial check on the document
tomorrow prior to submission on behalf of the Council.

If Councillors have any concerns with this or have any other input, please
make it known to the Council asap (as well as providing constructive input
to assist / remedy).

Jonathan 

-----Original Message-----
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 30 April 2015 18:35
To: Council
Subject: Fwd: [council] GNSO Council Comment on FY16 Draft Budget and
Operating Plan

Again, the formatting issue. Apologies to all.

Thanks.

Amr

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fwd: [council] GNSO Council Comment on FY16 Draft Budget and 
> Operating Plan
> Date: April 30, 2015 at 3:07:57 PM GMT+2
> To: Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings 
> <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, Glen de 
> Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Resending this, as it doesn?t seem to have made it through to the Council
list the first time.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council Comment on FY16 Draft Budget and 
>> Operating Plan
>> Date: April 30, 2015 at 2:36:47 PM GMT+2
>> To: Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Hello again,
>> 
>> I?ve attached a revised version of the statement including:
>> 
>> 1. Susan?s addition regarding the additional resources required for 
>> the post-EWG PDP 2. A paragraph describing a view on how Special 
>> Budget Requests fit in to the GNSO?s work and the FY16 draft budget and
operating plan 3. A form of disclaimer indicating that this letter is not
being submitted as a result of a Council motion and vote, but rather in the
absence of any objection.
>> 
>> Could folks please review this, and speak up if there are any objections
to submitting it or if any proposed changes are required?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Amr
>>