Re: [council] SCI motions
Hello everyone, and with thanks to Avri and Amr not just for the motions but also for their work on the SCI! This is just a note to state that, for items on the consent agenda, no vote will be necessary any items needing approval will be passed unless a Councilor objects, in which case that item will then be placed on the main agenda for further discussion and, where applicable, a vote. As such, Councilors are requested to review the two templates outlining the two possible referral requests to the SCI that were sent around before the last Council meeting (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/drafts for the relevant links dated 5 March 2015). If you wish to question or discuss either template, you will therefore have to ask that it be taken off the consent agenda (note that this can be done at the meeting itself when the consent agenda comes up). Should that occur, the motions that Avri submitted and that Amr seconded will then be considered to have been submitted within the prescribed time frame for motions. At that time, they will then be considered and discussed with a view toward conducting an actual vote on both. I hope this clarifies matters. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 13:38 To: "avri@xxxxxxx" <avri@xxxxxxx> Cc: Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [council] SCI motions > Hi, > > Being on both the Council and the SCI, I would be happy to second both > motions, and support them being on the consent agenda. To my knowledge, there > is consensus among the SCI members for the committee to take up this work. > > Thanks. > > Amr > > On Apr 6, 2015, at 6:18 PM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I submit the following 2 motions for the council meeting of 16 April. >> >> >> Motion on Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation (SCI) Review >> Request Concerning Seconding and Amendments >> Motion on Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation (SCI) Review >> Request Concerning Overlap of Waiver and Resubmission >> >> >> The have not yet been seconded. I ask any of the other SCI members on the >> council to consider seconding these motions. >> >> I request that these be included in the consent agenda. They were discussed >> at our last meeting and there have been no objections to the templates. As >> requred they are motions that require a simple majority vote and are not >> subject to absentee ballot. >> >> Thanks >> >> avri >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> <http://www.avast.com/> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast >> antivirus software. >> www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/> >> <Motion on SCI Review Request Concerning Motion Seconding and Amendments 06 >> April 2015.docx><Motion on SCI Review Request Concerning Overlap of Waiver >> and Resubmittion 06 April 2015.docx><SCI Review Request - Motions - 5 Mar >> 2015 v2.docx><SCI Review Request - Overlap of Waiver and Resubmission - 5 Mar >> 2015.docx> > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|