<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] motion for IGO-INGO WG charter amendment
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] motion for IGO-INGO WG charter amendment
- From: Bret Fausett <bret@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:30:04 -0700
- In-reply-to: <D1473B16.8A76F%skawaguchi@fb.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <D1473B16.8A76F%skawaguchi@fb.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you Susan. So I can understand this better, what is the delta between
"the IGO List provided to ICANN by the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) in
March 2013” and the "the legal protections for IGO names and acronyms that are
conferred by Article 6ter of the Paris Convention for the Protection of
Industrial Property”? Is there a comprehensive list of names and acronyms
protected by Article 6ter?
--
Bret Fausett, Esq.
General Counsel, Uniregistry, Corp.
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
mobile +1 310 985 1351
office +1 949 706 2300 x4201
http://uniregistry.link <http://uniregistry.link/>
> On Apr 6, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Susan Kawaguchi <susank@xxxxxx
> <mailto:susank@xxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
> As council liaison to the IGO-INGO working group I respectfully submit this
> motion for the council’s consideration.
> Susan Kawaguchi
> Domain Name Manager
> Facebook Legal Dept.
>
> Phone - 650 485-6064
>
>
>
> <Motion to amend WG charter - FINAL - 2 Apr 2015.docx>
--
Bret Fausett, Esq.
General Counsel, Uniregistry, Corp.
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 200
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
mobile +1 310 985 1351
office +1 949 706 2300 x4201
UTC -8 hours • http://uniregistry.link <http://uniregistry.link/>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|