Re: [council] Motion to implement the recommendations of the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group

[Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi again,

Having taken another look at the motion, it says:

The GNSO Council agrees to jointly implement with the GAC, the preliminary 
recommendations by the CG concerning the issue scoping phase of the PDP as 
outlined here 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gac-cg-issue-scoping-27jan15-en.pdf on a trial 
basis for a minimum of 3 GNSO PDPs.

So, I guess this answers my previous question. We’re not talking about 3 
consecutive PDPs, but rather 3 PDPs in which a QLM is used by the GAC.

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:11 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I would have been happy to second this motion, but Phil was quicker on the 
> draw than I was. :)
> 
> I do have one question, though. When the motion refers to an “end of this 
> trial period”, what exactly is the end?
> 
> Is it the end of the issue scoping phase of the third PDP a Quick Look 
> Mechanism (QLM) Committee actually tackles? Or is it the end of the third PDP 
> in its totality taking into account the QLM’s effectiveness (or lack of) in 
> encouraging GAC continued engagement in the PDP? This could also take into 
> account the GAC’s engagement in the PDP during the following phases beyond 
> the issue scoping, should a QLM Committee determine that there is or may be 
> public policy implications?
> 
> Another meaning for “end of this trial period” may be three consecutive PDPs 
> whether or not the GAC actually succeed in creating a QLM Committee to look 
> into the issue scoping phase.
> 
> Just trying to get a clear picture in my head on what the metrics of success 
> associated with this motion may be from a GNSO perspective. They are probably 
> different depending on what is meant by the “end”.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> 
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:14 PM, Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I am happy to second this motion so that it is in order for discussion at 
>> the March 19 Council meeting.
>>  
>> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
>> Virtualaw LLC
>> 1155 F Street, NW
>> Suite 1050
>> Washington, DC 20004
>> 202-559-8597/Direct
>> 202-559-8750/Fax
>> 202-255-6172/cell
>>  
>> Twitter: @VlawDC
>>  
>> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>>  
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 1:34 PM
>> To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [council] Motion to implement the recommendations of the GAC-GNSO 
>> Consultation Group
>>  
>> Dear All!
>>  
>> Please find attached for your consideration a motion considering the GAC – 
>> GNSO Consulting Group Preliminary Recommendations on Issue Scoping.
>>  
>> A seconder for the motion would be appreciated.
>>  
>> Thank you.
>>  
>>  
>> Kind regards
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> _____________________
>> 
>> email: crg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> +506 8837 7176 (cel)
>> +506 4000 2000 (home)
>> +506 2290 3678 (fax)
>> _____________________
>> Apartado 1571-1000
>> San Jose, COSTA RICA
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4299/9218 - Release Date: 03/03/15
>