ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Response letter ICANN Board Resolution concerning planning for future gTLD Application Rounds - deadline Monday 19 January 18.00 UTC

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Response letter ICANN Board Resolution concerning planning for future gTLD Application Rounds - deadline Monday 19 January 18.00 UTC
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 21:17:30 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHQMQiraT1i+7EHcUG9Eap2R9QGqg==
  • Thread-topic: Response letter ICANN Board Resolution concerning planning for future gTLD Application Rounds - deadline Monday 19 January 18.00 UTC
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117

As discussed during today's meeting, please provide any further comments / 
edits by Monday 19 January at 18.00 UTC. Note, I've added a sentence that I 
will hope address Gabriela's concern (if not, please feel to suggest edits). 
Following that, Jonathan will finalise the letter and submit it to the Board.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday 12 January 2015 09:29
To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: FW: [council] Draft response letter ICANN Board Resolution Concerning 
Planning for Future gTLD Application Rounds

Dear All,

As a reminder, please see attached the proposed response letter in relation to 
the ICANN Board Resolution concerning planning for future gTLD Application 
Rounds which includes proposed edits from Bret. If you have any further 
comments / edits, please feel free to share those ahead of the upcoming meeting 
on Thursday which has an agenda item dedicated to this topic.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Bret Fausett <bret@xxxxxxxx<mailto:bret@xxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday 11 December 2014 16:03
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] Draft response letter ICANN Board Resolution Concerning 
Planning for Future gTLD Application Rounds

Thank you, Marika. I have attached a very light redline to soften some of the 
wording that I thought could create a misunderstanding about what the 
Discussion Group is doing. As background for those not involved, we have used 
the Discussion Group simply to raise issues, not to think about solutions or 
policy recommendations. Any member of the group can raise an issue for 
inclusion, and we are not trying to reach consensus on what issues should be 
addressed or the possible policy outcomes. So I have recommended changing 
phrases such as "the DG is expressing concern...." to something like the "DG 
has raised the issue of...." because while one person may be concerned, I think 
it's too much to say that the group as a whole has that concern.

Overall, it's an excellent letter and a fair summary of the DG discussions to 
date, but I would be more comfortable with the revisions attached. Thank you 
again, and please let me know if anyone has questions about this.

       Bret

--
Bret Fausett, Esq. * General Counsel, Uniregistry, Inc.
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 200 * Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536
310-496-5755 (T) * 310-985-1351 (M) * 
bret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
bret@xxxxxxxx<mailto:bret@xxxxxxxx>
- - - - -

Attachment: v3 - Letter to Steve Crocker - 10 December 2014.docx
Description: v3 - Letter to Steve Crocker - 10 December 2014.docx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>