ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Council response on GNSO Review

  • To: Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [council] Council response on GNSO Review
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:12:18 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <032001d01977$9018a040$b049e0c0$@btinternet.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <032001d01977$9018a040$b049e0c0$@btinternet.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
Hi,

I still request that unanimous in the text be replaced with something
like 'most' or even 'a super majority' (not sure we can use the
consensus words without a GNSO process).  I will still not vote for it,
and will write up a comment explaining why, but at least the letter
would be correctly describing the situation in the council.

I do not know how the vote will go, but I am pretty sure it will not be
unanimous.

Thanks

avri

On 16-Dec-14 16:30, Tony Holmes wrote:
>
> All
>
> Just a polite reminder we agreed that input on the draft response from
> Council to the GNSO review could be received until 31^st December and
> Council would then vote electronically early January.
>
> To date no proposed revisions have been received.
>
> Best wishes for the festive season to all.
>
> Tony
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>