ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Moving ahead on the GAC communique

  • To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "'David Cake'" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Moving ahead on the GAC communique
  • From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:10:17 +0100
  • Cc: "'Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=key-systems.net; h=content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject :subject:to:mime-version:user-agent:from:from:date:date :message-id; s=dkim; t=1418040615; x=1418904615; bh=8jrOOXxaTRnD pUUlHp7VGiPWSKHMo2AyTs526jGzJOs=; b=Mlkp0PKLl4I4NoTDq78eWusNh0wa cuayfwd+bn7cf9Ww+1Gv1pzbppA1RhERDumrZO/3RnMD5d7KgkrlTNjCHkPYi5wU 49zBNDAW3q7Aq4Rg8F8DhrBi/NyC4d/F6TqFYeBnc9k2NQL3v27x+B8mWE1z2x1+ 3mlEWFvWboFadNk=
  • In-reply-to: <02ff01d012db$c4d67070$4e835150$@afilias.info>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <547F5332.4050501@key-systems.net> <2EA7826F-EB07-4809-A1C7-CC3EFC596FEE@difference.com.au> <54802A24.8080308@key-systems.net> <DFEE86BE-0665-44C6-AE54-AC469245DA78@difference.com.au> <02ff01d012db$c4d67070$4e835150$@afilias.info>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

Hi Jonathan,

thanks for picking up the discussion thread. My draft was intended as a straw man to poke holes in and get the ball rolling, so to speak.

Essentially it is all about how the process looks that will be followed on this matter.

I assumed that the GAC will continue to direct its messages and advice to the Board, and while the GNSO has the ability to review it, it would be helpful if we get a request from the board to do the review of where the advice intersects with policy, if only to have a proper chain of process in place.

So basically, I tried to answer what the basis is for the council to launch a review of a document not directed to the council. We may also chose to initiate such an analysis on our own as the Commuique likely touches upon our area of responsibility, but I felt it would be better to have a stamp of approval and formal request from the board.

In 2, your version works as it leaves open the format of our response, but I am not sure who the adressee of our response should be. I assumed it would be the board, with notification to the GAC as an optional component. But the other way round is also a possibility.

Best regards,

Volker




Am 08.12.2014 12:40, schrieb Jonathan Robinson:

Volker,

Please can you help me (us?) understand the thinking behind the following:

1."The ICANN board informs the GNSO council about the Communique ...  "

2."The GNSO council deliberates input and drafts a letter to the ICANN board including a proposed response to the GAC ... "

In 1 above, I realise that you said this could be optional. I am not sure it is necessary.

In 2 above, I wonder if it should be along the following lines:

The GNSO council deliberates input and drafts a proposed response to the GAC including preparing a copy of the proposed response to be sent to the ICANN board.

Thank-you

Jonathan

*From:*David Cake [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*Sent:* 05 December 2014 00:19
*To:* Volker Greimann
*Cc:* Council
*Subject:* Re: [council] Moving ahead on the GAC communique

On 4 Dec 2014, at 8:32 pm, Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:



Hi David,

I agree that any and all affected WGs [should/need to] be the first stop on our path to determining policy impact, however in some scenarios this may prove impractical: - the advice does not touch upon existing policy, i.e. would require a new policy making process; or - the advice touches upon existing policy that was created in the dawn of times (so to speak), so the original WG members are no longer available in sufficient numbers to advise the council.

Absolutely. Existing WGs should be consulted on matters that concern them, but that will not cover all issues.

Of course, there will also be elements of the GAC Communique which do not concern the GNSO directly, and that we do not need to comment on at all.

Regards

David


    Our process should have a clear path for all situations to ensure
    a quick turnaround.

    We may also want to reach out to the Policy and Implementation WG
    as they may have discussed elements of the puzzle we may find
    useful for this endeavor as well.

    Best,

    Volker

    Am 04.12.2014 03:01, schrieb David Cake:

        Thank you Volker for kicking this process along.

        I very much agree that input from Constituencies is valuable,
        but should be with reference to the existing policy process.

        I do think we should have a step in the process where we
        directly ask for input from all working groups that are
        referenced (directly or indirectly) by GAC advice. While we
        are working on more direct interaction between the GAC and
        WGs, when they are discussed in the GAC Communique we should
        respond on behalf of the GNSO, and of course such response
        should be in full consultation with the WG concerned.

        David

        On 4 Dec 2014, at 5:15 am, Volker Greimann
        <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
        wrote:



        As discussed during the last council meeting, one of our
        action items is for the Council toexamine ways in which the
        GAC communiqués can be channeled through the ICANN Board to
        the GNSO Council where they can be analyzed for possible
        policy implications arising from the recommendations, and
        where the GNSO Council can report back to the ICANN Board with
        a proposed method of responding to the communiqué and
        initiating policy work if there be a need.

        In the discussion, alightweight and informal process was
        proposed where a call for topics would be put out to the
        various GNSO constituencies and stakeholder groups and these
        would be sent in the form a letter by the Council, within 30
        to 60 days upon receipt of a GAC communiqué, to the Board
        responding to that communiqué.

        As a framework for discussion, the following steps are suggested:

        1) GAC publishes its communique
        1b) optional: The ICANN board informs the GNSO council about
        the Communique and requests an analysis of the communique for
        issues that touch upon ongoing or new policy work
        2) 1st post-meeting council session: The Council deliberates
        the GAC communique and instructs councillors take the
        communique to their stakeholder groups and constituencies for
        analysis of whether and if so how the communique touches upon,
        complements or contradicts existing policy, whether it impacts
        ongoing policy work or whether it suggests the initiation of
        new policy work. This review should exclude any opinion on
        such policy and be limited to the analysis whether policy
        would be affected and therefore should be obtainable within a
        turn-around time of 2 weeks.

        3) 2nd post-meeting council session: The GNSO council
        deliberates input and drafts a letter to the ICANN board
        including a proposed response to the GAC

        Potential responses could be:
        - Council recommends initiation of new policy work based on
        GAC advice

        - Council recommends informing the GAC that [suggestion] has
        been deliberated during previous or ongoing policy work and
        has been [accepted/rejected/partially accepted] by the community

        - Council recommends revisiting prior PDP to analyse and
        deliberate the impact of suggested advice on existing policy.

        - Council advises Board that existing policy already covers
        [suggestion] and [suggestion] is a mere question of
        implementation of said policy

        I am shooting from the hip here to put up a straw man, so if
        anyone would like to add to these suggestions or suggest a
        different approach, the floor is yours.

--
        Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

        Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

        Volker A. Greimann

        - Rechtsabteilung -

        Key-Systems GmbH

        Im Oberen Werk 1

        66386 St. Ingbert

        Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901

        Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851

        Email:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

        Web:www.key-systems.net  <http://www.key-systems.net/>  /www.RRPproxy.net  
<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>

        www.domaindiscount24.com  <http://www.domaindiscount24.com/>  
/www.BrandShelter.com  <http://www.brandshelter.com/>

        Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:

        www.facebook.com/KeySystems  <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>

        www.twitter.com/key_systems  <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>

        Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin

        Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken

        Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

        Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP

www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu/>
        Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. 
Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist 
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per 
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

        --------------------------------------------

        Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to 
contact us.

        Best regards,

        Volker A. Greimann

        - legal department -

        Key-Systems GmbH

        Im Oberen Werk 1

        66386 St. Ingbert

        Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901

        Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851

        Email:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

        Web:www.key-systems.net  <http://www.key-systems.net/>  /www.RRPproxy.net  
<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>

        www.domaindiscount24.com  <http://www.domaindiscount24.com/>  
/www.BrandShelter.com  <http://www.brandshelter.com/>

        Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay 
updated:

        www.facebook.com/KeySystems  <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>

        www.twitter.com/key_systems  <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>

        CEO: Alexander Siffrin

        Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken

        V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

        Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP

www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu/>
        This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom 
it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the 
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.



--
    Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

    Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

    Volker A. Greimann

    - Rechtsabteilung -

    Key-Systems GmbH

    Im Oberen Werk 1

    66386 St. Ingbert

    Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901

    Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851

    Email:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

    Web:www.key-systems.net  <http://www.key-systems.net/>  /www.RRPproxy.net  
<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>

    www.domaindiscount24.com  <http://www.domaindiscount24.com/>  
/www.BrandShelter.com  <http://www.brandshelter.com/>

    Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:

    www.facebook.com/KeySystems  <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>

    www.twitter.com/key_systems  <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>

    Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin

    Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken

    Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

    Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP

www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu/>
    Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. 
Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist 
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per 
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

    --------------------------------------------

    Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

    Best regards,

    Volker A. Greimann

    - legal department -

    Key-Systems GmbH

    Im Oberen Werk 1

    66386 St. Ingbert

    Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901

    Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851

    Email:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

    Web:www.key-systems.net  <http://www.key-systems.net/>  /www.RRPproxy.net  
<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>

    www.domaindiscount24.com  <http://www.domaindiscount24.com/>  
/www.BrandShelter.com  <http://www.brandshelter.com/>

    Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:

    www.facebook.com/KeySystems  <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>

    www.twitter.com/key_systems  <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>

    CEO: Alexander Siffrin

    Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken

    V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

    Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP

www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu/>
    This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it 
is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the 
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.


--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede 
Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist 
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per 
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the 
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>