<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] FW: NomCom appointee skill sets
- To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [council] FW: NomCom appointee skill sets
- From: David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:15:26 +0800
- Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <003e01cff3e5$94e723b0$beb56b10$@afilias.info>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CABs8SxNNMy-mB6nyYJO01RmTqbE8DdCS_hYFG0hrm=FO478O7g@mail.gmail.com> <06e1904fb81446028b92e1b9a0fad6ce@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <003e01cff3e5$94e723b0$beb56b10$@afilias.info>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would consider adding to the list of variable criteria:
- data protection and privacy law
- broader internet governance activities
I'm also not sure why 'the special needs of financial services businesses' is
on that list - not that I have a strong objection to anyone having this
expertise, but I do not recall any item of council business having looked at
this area in the last couple of years (though it is possible something is
slipping my mind).
David
On 30 Oct 2014, at 10:02 am, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> <NomCom - GNSO Candidate Criteria.docx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|