Re: [council] Motion to Adopt IRTP-D Final Report

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

I second.

avri

On 03-Oct-14 09:57, James M. Bladel wrote:
> Councilors:
> 
> In preparation for our next meeting in Los Angeles, I would like to
> formally introduce the motion (below) to adopt the Final Report and
> Recommendations of the IRTP Part D PDP (IRTP-D) Working Group.
> 
> I am also seeking a second for this motion.  Please let me know if
> you have questions or need additional info.
> 
> Thanks-
> 
> J.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> - Motion on the Adoption of the IRTP Part D Final Report and
> Recommendations
> 
> Whereas
> 
> 
> 1.     On 17 January 2013, the GNSO Council launched a Policy
> Development Process (PDP) on IRTP Part D
> [http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions -
> 201301<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201301>]
> addressing the following six Charter questions:
> 
> 
> a)     Whether reporting requirements for registries and dispute
> providers should be developed, in order to make precedent and trend
> information available to the community and allow reference to past
> cases in dispute submissions;
> 
> b)     Whether additional provisions should be included in the TDRP
> (Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy) on how to handle disputes when
> multiple transfers have occurred;
> 
> c)     Whether dispute options for registrants should be developed
> and implemented as part of the policy (registrants currently depend
> on registrars to initiate a dispute on their behalf);
> 
> d)     Whether requirements or best practices should be put into
> place for registrars to make information on transfer dispute
> resolution options available to registrant;
> 
> e)     Whether existing penalties for policy violations are
> sufficient or if additional provisions/penalties for specific
> violations should be added into the policy;
> 
> f)      Whether the universal adoption and implementation of EPP
> AuthInfo codes has eliminated the need of FOAs.
> 
> 
> 2.     This PDP has followed the prescribed PDP steps as stated in
> the Bylaws, resulting in a Final Report delivered on 25 September
> 2014;
> 
> 
> 
> 3.     The IRTP Part D WG has reached full consensus on the 18
> recommendations in relation to the six issues outlined above;
> 
> 
> 
> 4.     The GNSO Council has reviewed and discussed these
> recommendations.
> 
> Now therefore be it resolved,
> 
> 
> 1.     The GNSO Council recommends to the ICANN Board of Directors
> the adoption of the IRTP Part D recommendations (#1 to #18) as
> detailed in the IRTP Part D Final Report
> [http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/transfers/irtp-d-final-25sep14-en.pdf].
>
> 
> 
> 
> 2.     The GNSO Council shall convene an IRTP Part D Implementation
> Review Team to assist ICANN Staff in developing the implementation
> details for the new policy should it be approved by the ICANN Board.
> The Implementation Review Team will be tasked with evaluating the
> proposed implementation of the policy recommendations as approved by
> the Board and is expected to work with ICANN Staff to ensure that the
> resultant implementation fulfils the intentions of the approved
> policies. If the IRTP Part D Implementation Review Team identifies
> any potential modifications to the policy or new policy
> recommendations, the IRTP Part D Implementation Review Team shall
> refer these to the GNSO Council for its consideration and follow-up,
> as appropriate. Following adoption by the ICANN Board of the
> recommendations, the GNSO Secretariat is authorized to issue a call
> for volunteers for an IRTP Part D Implementation Review Team to the
> members of the IRTP Part D Working Group.
>