<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Re: [council] FW: SO-AC-SG HIGH INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles - A Reminder
- To: "Volker Greimann" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Re: [council] FW: SO-AC-SG HIGH INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles - A Reminder
- From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:08:21 -0700
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <53FDDFDD.8010704@key-systems.net>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: MailAPI
All,
I have a question.
In as much as the original request was made of SO and ACs leaders, are you not
funneling your recommendations through your constituency or stakeholder group?
I would hate to see the suggestions from those groups overlooked because staff
looks at the GNSO Council as some sort of hierarchical filter.
Berard
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [council] FW: SO-AC-SG HIGH
INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles - A Reminder
From: "Volker Greimann" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 8/27/14 6:40 am
To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I think we have had a number of good suggestions including from Avri and James
which all fit under one overarching theme: "What is the essence of ICANN?",
i.e. is ICANN the corporation, is ICANN the community, or is it both?
Avris trust comments stem from a problem that arises when staff makes an
upopular decision, rubber stamped by the board in a process that has no
accountability built in that is worth writing home about. We have seen public
comment presentations where comments were re-interpreted or manipulated to suit
a certain desired outcome.
Such actions breed dissent and potentially disfunctionality. We have discussed
the problem of recruiting volunteers for policy work, but is it a wonder that
volunteer numbers are dwindling when the perception exists (real or imagined)
that big decisions are made that exclude or disregard community input? What
causes for mistrust can be eliminated, and how? How do we see ICANN
accountability as functional and effective? How should government influence
work, where are its limits?
So I would propose that instead of focussing on one narrow topic we should
initiate a series of bottom-up debates on how the community would like to see
ICANN develop in the next years, an Agenda 2020 if you will.
Best,
Volker
Am 27.08.2014 15:21, schrieb James M. Bladel:
Hi Jonathan, thanks for kicking this off. Another potential topic, perhaps
belonging under the umbrella of "Accountability":
I would like to see a frank & candid, community-wide discussion on the future
role of the GAC. Between TLD safeguards, proposed changes to the Bylaws, the
sticky IGO/NGO issue, and the very real possibility that the GAC could
unilaterally adopt a voting model, all converge on an ICANN model that is
dominated by a multi-governmental structure, which fails a key element of the
March 2014 NTIA announcement.
Everyone recognizes the need for governments to have a seat at the table, and
for their advice to be given careful consideration on matters concerning public
policy. But there's a sliver of "public policy" in everything at ICANN, and
the nature of government participation makes them reluctant to accept anything
short of immediate and total adoption of their advice.
Where do we go from here? Can the relevance of the SO/ACs be preserved, or is
every topic or material issue destined to become a GAC/Board negotiation? What
limitations or backstops can check government influence, while still allowing
for full consideration of their advice?
Thank you,
J.
____________
James Bladel
GoDaddy
On Aug 26, 2014, at 14:40, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,
Please be aware that ICANN is seeking (urgent) input on selection of content
for a “high interest” topic session in LA.
Thanks,
Jonathan
From: David Olive [mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 August 2014 03:04
To: Byron Holland; heather.dryden@xxxxxxxx; Jonathan Robinson; Louie Lee;
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; Patrik Fältström; Jun Murai; Lars-Johan
Liman; Elisa Cooper; tony holmes; krosette@xxxxxxx; rafik dammak; William
Drake; Michele Neylon :: Blacknight; Drazek, Keith; Rudi Vansnick; Fadi
Chehade; Cassia Oliveira; Tina Shelebian; Lynn Lipinski; Lynn Gravel; Gisella
Gruber; Global Leadership; William Drake; Robert Hoggarth; Duncan Burns
Subject: Re: SO-AC-SG HIGH INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles -
A Reminder
Dear Community Leaders:
It's been an unusually busy August so far and, understandably, I have not
received much feedback from you all on prospective topics for your SO-AC
High-Interest topic at the ICANN51 Public Meeting in Los Angeles.
Certain topics, such as ICANN Accountability, the IANA Stewardship Transition,
and new gTLD Directory Services (WHOIS), appear to be covered by other session
programming on Monday or elsewhere during the week, so, additional topics are
now needed for the potential session discussion.
The staff meeting and programming team is giving me some more time to
collaborate with you on this session, and we should start identifying some
specific topics so that you have time to lead some conversations within your
communities over the next month in preparation for the LA session discussion.
I've been able to extend the topic-brainstorming deadline to COB this
Thursday. Please share any thoughts or ideas with me at your earliest
convenience.
Best,
David
David A. Olive
Vice President, Policy Development Support
General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters -Istanbul
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct Line: +90.212.381.8727
Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611
Email: david.olive@xxxxxxxxx
www.icann.org
From: David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2014 7:49 PM
To: Byron Holland <byron.holland@xxxxxxx>, Heather Dryden
<Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Louie Lee <louie@xxxxxxxxx>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, Patrik
Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxx>, Jun Murai <junsec@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lars-Johan
Liman <liman@xxxxxxxxx>, Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tony
holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "krosette@xxxxxxx" <krosette@xxxxxxx>,
Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>,
"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Drazek, Keith"
<kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>, Fadi Chehade
<fadi.chehade@xxxxxxxxx>, Cassia Oliveira <cassia.oliveira@xxxxxxxxx>, Tina
Shelebian <tina.shelebian@xxxxxxxxx>, Lynn Lipinski <lynn.lipinski@xxxxxxxxx>,
Lynn Gravel <lynn.gravel@xxxxxxx>, Gisella Gruber <Gisella.Gruber@xxxxxxxxx>,
Global Leadership <global_leadership@xxxxxxxxx>, William Drake
<wjdrake@xxxxxxxxx>, Rob Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, Duncan Burns
<duncan.burns@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: SO-AC-SG HIGH INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles
Dear SO/AC/SG Leaders:
Thank you all for confirming your interest in proceeding with the planning for
an SO-AC High Interest Session in Los Angeles. Working with our staff Meeting
Team colleagues, it appears that Monday in LA will again offer the best window
for the session. I have informed the ICANN 51 Steering Committee of the need
for the session and we have discussed the following scenario.
Monday programming will offer opportunities for community discussion on a
range of topics of high interest to the community. We can count on their being
at least one session addressing the IANA Stewardship Transition and another
session addressing the ICANN Accountability matter. Heather has also noted the
likelihood of a GAC request for a session on Registration Data (WHOIS) issues.
As a result of this overall concept, we suggest planning to conduct a session
that highlights one or two topics of high community interest that are different
from these three main topic areas. It would be helpful to have you share topic
suggestion on this list over the next week or so. Staff will compile the list
of all suggestion received by 25 August and then I'll circulate the list of
possibilities to all of you for winnowing down. My hope is that, via email, we
can quickly reach consensus on a couple of topics so that all of you will have
the opportunity to glean your community views to share during the session.
Logistically, we will plan to run the session largely like the previous
hot-topic session in Buenos Aires - recall the Brad White-led format. I am
happy to get feedback from you on any improvements we can introduce to that
format previous format.
Looking forward to hearing your suggestion of topics.
Best regards,
David
David A. Olive
Vice President, Policy Development Support
General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters -Istanbul
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct Line: +90.212.381.8727
Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611
Email: david.olive@xxxxxxxxx
www.icann.org
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese
Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|