<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] FW: SO-AC-SG HIGH INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles - A Reminder
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] FW: SO-AC-SG HIGH INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles - A Reminder
- From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:36:50 +0200
- In-reply-to: <13C774E8-6C28-4E0C-B7E6-7A3D56759998@godaddy.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <D0220A6D.2EC22%david.olive@icann.org>,<010301cfc165$3e234430$ba69cc90$@afilias.info> <13C774E8-6C28-4E0C-B7E6-7A3D56759998@godaddy.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I second James’ suggestion, and believe it to be a very appropriate concern and
suggestion to be made by the Council responsible for managing the GNSO’s PDP.
Thanks.
Amr
On Aug 27, 2014, at 3:21 PM, James M. Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan, thanks for kicking this off. Another potential topic, perhaps
> belonging under the umbrella of "Accountability":
>
> I would like to see a frank & candid, community-wide discussion on the future
> role of the GAC. Between TLD safeguards, proposed changes to the Bylaws, the
> sticky IGO/NGO issue, and the very real possibility that the GAC could
> unilaterally adopt a voting model, all converge on an ICANN model that is
> dominated by a multi-governmental structure, which fails a key element of the
> March 2014 NTIA announcement.
>
> Everyone recognizes the need for governments to have a seat at the table, and
> for their advice to be given careful consideration on matters concerning
> public policy. But there's a sliver of "public policy" in everything at
> ICANN, and the nature of government participation makes them reluctant to
> accept anything short of immediate and total adoption of their advice.
>
> Where do we go from here? Can the relevance of the SO/ACs be preserved, or
> is every topic or material issue destined to become a GAC/Board negotiation?
> What limitations or backstops can check government influence, while still
> allowing for full consideration of their advice?
>
> Thank you,
>
> J.
> ____________
> James Bladel
> GoDaddy
>
> On Aug 26, 2014, at 14:40, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Please be aware that ICANN is seeking (urgent) input on selection of content
>> for a “high interest” topic session in LA.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> From: David Olive [mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 26 August 2014 03:04
>> To: Byron Holland; heather.dryden@xxxxxxxx; Jonathan Robinson; Louie Lee;
>> Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; Patrik Fältström; Jun Murai; Lars-Johan Liman;
>> Elisa Cooper; tony holmes; krosette@xxxxxxx; rafik dammak; William Drake;
>> Michele Neylon :: Blacknight; Drazek, Keith; Rudi Vansnick; Fadi Chehade;
>> Cassia Oliveira; Tina Shelebian; Lynn Lipinski; Lynn Gravel; Gisella Gruber;
>> Global Leadership; William Drake; Robert Hoggarth; Duncan Burns
>> Subject: Re: SO-AC-SG HIGH INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles
>> - A Reminder
>>
>> Dear Community Leaders:
>>
>> It’s been an unusually busy August so far and, understandably, I have not
>> received much feedback from you all on prospective topics for your SO-AC
>> High-Interest topic at the ICANN51 Public Meeting in Los Angeles.
>>
>> Certain topics, such as ICANN Accountability, the IANA Stewardship
>> Transition, and new gTLD Directory Services (WHOIS), appear to be covered
>> by other session programming on Monday or elsewhere during the week, so,
>> additional topics are now needed for the potential session discussion.
>>
>> The staff meeting and programming team is giving me some more time to
>> collaborate with you on this session, and we should start identifying some
>> specific topics so that you have time to lead some conversations within your
>> communities over the next month in preparation for the LA session discussion.
>>
>> I’ve been able to extend the topic-brainstorming deadline to COB this
>> Thursday. Please share any thoughts or ideas with me at your earliest
>> convenience.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> David
>>
>> David A. Olive
>> Vice President, Policy Development Support
>> General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters –Istanbul
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>> Direct Line: +90.212.381.8727
>> Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611
>> Email: david.olive@xxxxxxxxx
>> www.icann.org
>>
>>
>> From: David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thursday, August 14, 2014 7:49 PM
>> To: Byron Holland <byron.holland@xxxxxxx>, Heather Dryden
>> <Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Robinson
>> <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Louie Lee <louie@xxxxxxxxx>, Olivier MJ
>> Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxx>, Jun Murai
>> <junsec@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lars-Johan Liman <liman@xxxxxxxxx>, Elisa Cooper
>> <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tony holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> "krosette@xxxxxxx" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, Rafik Dammak
>> <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>, "Michele
>> Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Drazek, Keith"
>> <kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>, Fadi Chehade
>> <fadi.chehade@xxxxxxxxx>, Cassia Oliveira <cassia.oliveira@xxxxxxxxx>, Tina
>> Shelebian <tina.shelebian@xxxxxxxxx>, Lynn Lipinski
>> <lynn.lipinski@xxxxxxxxx>, Lynn Gravel <lynn.gravel@xxxxxxx>, Gisella Gruber
>> <Gisella.Gruber@xxxxxxxxx>, Global Leadership <global_leadership@xxxxxxxxx>,
>> William Drake <wjdrake@xxxxxxxxx>, Rob Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>,
>> Duncan Burns <duncan.burns@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: SO-AC-SG HIGH INTEREST TOPIC SESSION @ ICANN 51 in Los Angeles
>>
>> Dear SO/AC/SG Leaders:
>>
>> Thank you all for confirming your interest in proceeding with the planning
>> for an SO-AC High Interest Session in Los Angeles. Working with our staff
>> Meeting Team colleagues, it appears that Monday in LA will again offer the
>> best window for the session. I have informed the ICANN 51 Steering
>> Committee of the need for the session and we have discussed the following
>> scenario.
>>
>> Monday programming will offer opportunities for community discussion on a
>> range of topics of high interest to the community. We can count on their
>> being at least one session addressing the IANA Stewardship Transition and
>> another session addressing the ICANN Accountability matter. Heather has
>> also noted the likelihood of a GAC request for a session on Registration
>> Data (WHOIS) issues.
>>
>> As a result of this overall concept, we suggest planning to conduct a
>> session that highlights one or two topics of high community interest that
>> are different from these three main topic areas. It would be helpful to
>> have you share topic suggestion on this list over the next week or so.
>> Staff will compile the list of all suggestion received by 25 August and then
>> I’ll circulate the list of possibilities to all of you for winnowing down.
>> My hope is that, via email, we can quickly reach consensus on a couple of
>> topics so that all of you will have the opportunity to glean your community
>> views to share during the session.
>>
>> Logistically, we will plan to run the session largely like the previous
>> hot-topic session in Buenos Aires – recall the Brad White-led format. I am
>> happy to get feedback from you on any improvements we can introduce to that
>> format previous format.
>>
>> Looking forward to hearing your suggestion of topics.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David
>>
>> David A. Olive
>> Vice President, Policy Development Support
>> General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters –Istanbul
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>> Direct Line: +90.212.381.8727
>> Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611
>> Email: david.olive@xxxxxxxxx
>> www.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|