ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] FW: GAC Liaison the GAC

  • To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] FW: GAC Liaison the GAC
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:52:54 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <FC666C1E-4DB4-4280-BB9E-CE51B8965244@egyptig.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <d20f23df725641db8285fcf4032684d9@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <014201cfb6e2$56d111c0$04733540$@afilias.info>,<FC666C1E-4DB4-4280-BB9E-CE51B8965244@egyptig.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac+20yCitekbzOt7ThKTXQEunaQVlwASeE2AAAIfTID//489CQ==
  • Thread-topic: [council] FW: GAC Liaison the GAC

Hi Amr,

As this is a pilot for a one year duration (FY2015) the term will end on 30 
June 2015 following which the GAC and GNSO Council will review the pilot and 
determine whether to continue or not. Should a determination be made that the 
liaison role should continue, further consideration would indeed need to be 
given to duration of the term as well as possible limitations.

Best regards,

Marika

On 13 aug. 2014, at 13:37, "Amr Elsadr" 
<aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Hi,

Thanks for the update, Jonathan, and thanks to the Council leadership team for 
their considerations and selection.

I was wondering wether or not others feel it necessary and desirable to set a 
term limit for the GNSO liaison to the GAC when considering drawing up the 
motion. Perhaps a two-year term limit with the option of renewal similar to a 
Councillor's term. We haven't really discussed this, and their are not 
guidelines in the operating procedures to steer by.

Just a thought..., and thanks again.

Amr

On Aug 13, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Jonathan Robinson 
<jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

All,

Please be aware that the note below has today been sent out to Mason Cole.

A similar note has been sent to the applicants who were not successful this 
time.

You can expect a motion to this effect to be put forward to the GNSO Council 
meeting on September 4th.

Thanks,

Jonathan

From: Glen de Saint G?ry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 August 2014 09:47
To: Mason Cole
Subject: GAC Liaison the GAC

Dear Mason,

On behalf of the GNSO Council leadership team, we would like to thank you very 
much for your application and your willingness to volunteer for this position 
to support the activities of GNSO Council.

The applications received were all of extremely high quality and it was a 
difficult choice to make. The three evaluators have carefully and thoroughly 
evaluated each application against the specified criteria. Following this 
process, I am pleased to be able to inform you that your application was 
selected to be put forward to the GNSO Council for the position of GNSO Liaison 
to the GAC. A motion to support your selection will be put before the GNSO 
Council at the September 4th meeting of the Council.

On behalf of the GNSO Council, thank you very much for taking the time and care 
to submit a letter and statement of interest.

Kind regards,
Glen

Glen de Saint G?ry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>