ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: Re: [council] IGO/RC motion

John, if the BC question is why are we willing to CONSIDER re-opening the decision, the answer is because we were asked to by the Board.
My personal answer (and this is not an ALAC statement) is that we are continually saying that the Board must be willing to reconsider decisions that they or staff (or a subcontractor) make to look at whether the conditions have changed or there is some other reason to rethink the issue. I think it is reasonable that we be subject to similar reconsideration. 

Whether we will or not remains to be seen.

Alan

At 23/07/2014 03:04 PM, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Alan, Thomas, et. al.,
In as much as the motion and its intended action (to take another look at the protections given ICO and INGOs in the new gTLD program) is as much politics as policy, I don't think delaying the discussion and vote enhances likelihood of passage. There are voices in the BC who question why we are willing to re-open a decision that was unanimously closed. 

Cheers,

Berard

--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: Re: [council] IGO/RC motion
From: "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 7/23/14 11:41 am
To: "Thomas Rickert" <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 


Thanks for the heads up Thomas.

That unfortunately adds another month to the
process. Is there really no way to get
clarification of what they meant outside of a
Council meeting? This does not speak well to our communications skills.

Alan

At 23/07/2014 01:24 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
>All,
>in my previous e-mail on this subject, I
>mentioned that Chris will join the upcoming GNSO
>Council call. We have now spotted that I invited
>him for the 25th and not the 24th (my bad - I
>took the June date from the GNSO master calendar
>instead of the July date) and Chris is in a
>plane at that time. I am happy to report that
>the NGPC willing to provide us with information.
>However, such information will not be with us before the call.
>
>In my view, we have two topics to discuss, which are
>
>- getting a better understanding and clarity on
>how to invoke a procedure that the Council has never invoked before and
>- the substance of the motion itself.
>
>Having discussed this with Jonathan, I would
>like to ask that we discuss the procedural issue
>during the call. We might also discuss the
>substance of the motion, but I would like to let
>you know that I will likely withdraw the motion
>during the meeting pending further clarification.
>
>Thanks,
>Thomas
>
>Am 19.07.2014 um 20:59 schrieb Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> >
> > All,
> > in the light of the discussions on the list,
> I have asked Chris Disspain to join the
> upcoming Council call and he accepted the invitation.
> >
> > I am sure that this will help us understand
> better what the NGPC's thinking is so we can
> take this into account when discussing the
> motion. I suggest to get back to the amendments
> that were proposed once we have heard Chris.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
> > =============
> > thomas-rickert.tel
> > +49.228.74.898.0
> >
> >> Am 17.07.2014 um 11:37 schrieb Volker
> Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >>
> >> I support the suggestions James made.
> >>
> >> V.
> >>
> >> Am 16.07.2014 19:14, schrieb James M. Bladel:
> >>> Some other thoughts:
> >>>
> >>> First ³Resolved² clause: Are we, in fact, re-convening the PDP WG? I
> >>> thought the goal was to reconvene volunteers that had previous served on > >>> the PDP WG to form a consultative WG to consider the amendments. Also, I 
> >>> don¹t know if the Council should re-confirm Thomas, rather let the WG
> >>> decide if he should be reconfirmed, or if
> they even need a permanent chair
> >>> for this short-term effort.
> >>>
> >>> Proposed (friendly?) amendment:
> >>> ³The GNSO Council hereby calls for volunteers that have previously served 
> >>> in the IGO/NGO PDP WG to reconvene as a
> [Review Team], and establishes the
> >>> previous Chair (Thomas Rickert) as Interim Chair."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Second ³Resolved² Clause: Whatever we end up calling this group, it
> >>> should flow through the subsequent clauses.
> >>> Proposed (friendly?) amendment:
> >>> ³The GNSO requests the reconvened [Review Team] to consider?.²
> >>>
> >>> Third ³Resolved² Clause: 45 days is a
> tight deadline, should we allow the
> >>> new group to report back if it needs more time?
> >>> Proposed (friendly?) amendment:
> >>> ³The GNSO Council requests that the [Review
> Team] provide the Council with
> >>> its recommendations in relation to the proposed amendment/modification
> >>> within forty-five (45) days of reconvening the group, or report back to
> >>> the Council prior to the end of this period
> with an updated time frame for
> >>> completion of its work.²
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> J.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 7/14/14, 13:53 , "Thomas Rickert" <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> All,
> >>>> I herewith submit the attached motion as discussed during the London
> >>>> meeting. I am sure we will continue the conversation in the light of the 
> >>>> latest developments.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kind regards,
> >>>> Thomas
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
> >>
> >> Mit freundlichen Grü�en,
> >>
> >> Volker A. Greimann
> >> - Rechtsabteilung -
> >>
> >> Key-Systems GmbH
> >> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>
> >> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
> >> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>
> >> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
> >> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
> >>
> >> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >> www.keydrive.lu
> >>
> >> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich
> und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt.
> Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung
> oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger
> ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht
> für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich
> mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Should you have any further questions,
> please do not hesitate to contact us.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Volker A. Greimann
> >> - legal department -
> >>
> >> Key-Systems GmbH
> >> Im Oberen Werk 1
> >> 66386 St. Ingbert
> >> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
> >> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
> >> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
> >> www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
> >>
> >> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan
> community on Facebook and stay updated:
> >> www.facebook.com/KeySystems
> >> www.twitter.com/key_systems
> >>
> >> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
> >> Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
> >> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
> >>
> >> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
> >> www.keydrive.lu
> >>
> >> This e-mail and its attachments is intended
> only for the person to whom it is addressed.
> Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any
> content of this email. You must not use,
> disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail.
> If an addressing or transmission error has
> misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
> author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>