<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
- From: "Winterfeldt, Brian J." <brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:56:52 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac+QW8iVgk6gcP9hQBO66lmwYBae+w==
- Thread-topic: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
Dear all:
I wanted to clarify that the mechanisms we are discussing in connection with
the motion and PDP WG, namely the UDRP, the URS, and any newly developed
mechanism for IGOs, are all administrative alternative dispute resolution
mechanisms, rather than arbitration mechanisms. There is an important legal
distinction between the two that we should recognize and adopt in our
discussions.
The UDRP and URS are contractual administrative mechanisms for resolving
disputes outside of national courts. Conversely, arbitration awards are inter
alia enforceable in national courts. See Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York (June 10, 1958).
I do not believe this subtle point necessitates any changes to the draft
Charter. I just wanted to add some clarity to guide our Council discussions,
and perhaps PDP WG deliberations.
Thank you,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt
Head of Internet Practice
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118
p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244
575 Madison Avenue / New York, NY 10022-2585
p / (212) 940.6762 f / (212) 894.5585
brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/>
-----Original Message-----
From: Winterfeldt, Brian J.
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:47 PM
To: Marano, Phillip V.
Subject: FW: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
________________________________________
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn>
Behalf OfAvri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 1:44:44 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
A revised revision of the charter that corrects one mistake.
avri
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:58:43 -0700
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>
To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>, Maria Farrell
<maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>>
Hello ladies - are you planning to send this to the Council for discussion this
evening? Thanks!
From: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx%20%3cmailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx>>>
Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 2:31 PM
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx%20%3cmailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>>
Subject: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
FYI - just sent
*Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel
1703 North Beauregard Street
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>
<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>
Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0
*From:*Lori Schulman
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 9:21 AM
*To:* 'Kathy Kleiman'; 'Avri Doria (avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>
<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>)'
*Cc:* 'Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>
<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>)'; 'Rafik Dammak
(rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>)'
*Subject:* RE: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
*Importance:* High
Dear All,
Attached is the amendment with the name of the UN list corrected. I
didn't catch that last night. I went to the UN link that Avri
provided and literally copied the title. There is a redline with
the corrected version and then a "clean" redline. This should go to
the GNSO Council. This was clearly a drafting error.
Lori
*Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel
1703 North Beauregard Street
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>
<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>
Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0
*From:*Lori Schulman
*Sent:* Monday, June 23, 2014 4:41 PM
*To:* 'Kathy Kleiman'; Avri Doria (avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>
<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>)
*Cc:* Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>
<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>); Rafik Dammak
(rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>)
*Subject:* RE: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 (3) with LS Edit
I like these changes. Thanks for expanding. I especially like the
"research who already owns marks." Good Luck at the GNSO.
*Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel
1703 North Beauregard Street
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>
<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>
Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0
*From:*Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kathy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
<mailto:[mailto:kathy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]>
*Sent:* Monday, June 23, 2014 3:45 PM
*To:* Lori Schulman; Avri Doria (avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>
<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>)
*Cc:* Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>
<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>); Rafik Dammak
(rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>)
*Subject:* Re: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 (3) with LS Edit
Hi All,
Tx so much to Lori for starting everything. I really appreciate it!
All, here is an edited version based on considerations of scope and
limits that we discussed in framing both the UDRP and URS. What do
you think?
Best,
Kathy
p.s. Lori, again, tx you! What do you think of the edits?
Hopefully, I extended and continued your thoughts...
:
Dear Avri and Kathy,
Here is my attempt at a short, hopefully not too debatable,
amendment to the charter. My edits and comments are in redline
form. I tried to keep it very simple given the issue of time.
I put 2 new bullet points before the final bullet point under
"The WG should also include the following additional topics in
its deliberations:"
I specifically referenced the Nice Classification system as a
method of mission differentiation as an optional clause. My
thoughts are to leave it out but I wanted to surface the option
to the group instead of just dismissing it out of hand. Nice
has a lot of problems but it is the document that drives
international classification and may be worth referencing. I
will leave that up to you.
/ /
I believe that this working group should move forward and
incorporate the principles that we discussed yesterday. Perhaps
these few lines will do the trick?
Please let me know if I can help further.
*Explore ways to make excellent teaching the reality in every
classroom. Attend the ASCD Conference on Teaching Excellence,
June 27-29, in Dallas, Tex. Choose from more than 150 sessions
on assessment, college and career readiness, STEM, and
instructional practices. Featured presenters include Jay
McTighe, Baruti Kafele, Richard Curwin and Carol Ann Tomlinson.
Register NOW at **www.ascd.org/cte. <http://www.ascd.org/cte>*
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information
that is
confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended
recipient or
have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments.
Please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message
and any
attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus
free.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<http://www.avast.com/>
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
<http://www.avast.com/> protection is active.
*Explore ways to make excellent teaching the reality in every
classroom. Attend the ASCD Conference on Teaching Excellence, June
27-29, in Dallas, Tex. Choose from more than 150 sessions on
assessment, college and career readiness, STEM, and instructional
practices. Featured presenters include Jay McTighe, Baruti Kafele,
Richard Curwin and Carol Ann Tomlinson. Register NOW at
**www.ascd.org/cte. <http://www.ascd.org/cte>*****
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is
confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or
have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify
the
sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and
any
attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus
free.
===========================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information
intended for the exclusive
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is
proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing,
copying, disclosure or
distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or
sanction. Please notify
the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and
delete the original
message without making any copies.
===========================================================
NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability
partnership that has
elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
===========================================================
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|