Re: [council] GNSO Council Action Items - 5 June 2014

[Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Councilors,

Following up on the action item accompanying Item 5 (draft Charter for the
IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP), please share your
and/or your SG/Constituency¹s comments and suggestions relating to the draft
Charter so that an updated version can be presented in London. For your
convenience, the draft Charter is attached to this email.

As noted on the Council call, the draft Charter: (1) enumerates specific
tasks and considerations listed in the body of the Final Issue Report for
the WG, including the need to conduct research and obtain updated data; (2)
specifies outreach to other SO/ACs including the GAC as well as to
interested IGOs and INGOs to encourage participation; (3) recommends WG
tracking/monitoring of developments in relation to GAC/GNSO/Board dialogue
on the remaining IGO-INGO PDP WG recommendations not yet adopted by the
Board; and (4) limits the PDP scope to only those IGO & INGO identifiers
specified as eligible for second level protections by the IGO-INGO PDP WG.

Thanks and cheers
Mary



From:  Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Friday, June 6, 2014 at 8:58 AM
To:  "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  [council] GNSO Council  Action Items - 5 June 2014

>  
> Dear Councillors,
> 
> 
> Please find the action items arising from the GNSO Council meeting on Thursday
> 5 June 2014.
> 
>  
> 
> Item 4: MOTION ­ Initiation of a PDP on IGO and INGO Access to Curative Rights
> Protection Mechanisms
> Action Item
> 
> PDP Working Group on IGO and INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection
> Mechanismsbe convened as soon as possible following the adoption of the
> charter to fulfill the requirements of this PDP in an expedited manner.
> 
>  
> 
> Item 5: Motion - Approval of a Charter for a PDP Working Group for the IGO &
> INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP
> 
>  
> 
> Council members are encouraged to share any further comments / questions in
> relation to the proposed charter with the mailing list ahead of the next GNSO
> Council meeting.
> 
>  
> 
> Item 6: MOTION ­ Close the work on WHOIS Studies and discuss any appropriate
> next steps 
> Action Item
> Jonathan Robinson to communicate the outcome to the GAC Chair.
> Agenda item for the GAC GNSO meeting on Sunday 22 June 2014 in London
> Item 7: DISCUSSION ­ Internet Governance Issues
> 
> Action Item
> Jonathan Robinson to develop first draft of possible Council input during the
> reply period on Enhancing ICANN Accountability
> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/enhancing-accountability-2014-05-06-en>
> (deadline for comments is 27 June 2014)
> 
> Item 8: Update ­ Update on the work of the GNSO Review Working Party
> 
> Action Item
> 
> Encourage the Council to review the questions of the 360 assessment and
> provide feedback 
> (see 
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48337497/360%20Introduction.p
> df?version=1&modificationDate=1400714058000&api=v2
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48337497/360%20Introduction.
> pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1400714058000&api=v2> ).
> 
>  
> 
> Item 10: Update ­ Issues for the SCI
> 
> Action Item
> 
> Alan Greenberg and Avri Doria volunteered to scope out the issue of voting
> thresholds in relation to implementation changes to adopted PDP
> recommendations for Council review.
> 
> Jonathan Robinson volunteered to lead the discussion on the common
> understanding of amendments to motions on the Council list as well as the role
> of the maker & seconder of motions.
> 
> 
> The Council will consider at a future meeting whether or not to refer these
> items to the SCI for further review.
> 
>  
> 
> Item 11: UPDATE & DISCUSSION ­ Planning for London
> Action Item
> Provide input to the Council list and or Volker Greimann for further topics
> for discussion for meetings with the Board, Fadi Chehadé, the ccNSO and the
> GAC in preparation for these meetings.
> 
>  
> 
> Item 12: Any other business
> * Public comment on the Strategic Plan
> <https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/stratplan-draft-09apr14-en.htm>
> ­ Council members to consider whether in the future there would be an interest
> / need to provide input from a Council perspective similar to what the ccNSO
> Council does.
> * Whois Requirements and National Law Conflicts Procedure Review ­ Council
> members are encouraged to review the staff paper on this topic
> (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en
> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en
> > ) which will be further discussed in London.
> * A GNSO Council Liaison for the Thick WHOIS Implementation Review Team (IRT)
> ­ Jonathan to confirm with Amr, who is already a member of the IRT, whether he
> would be willing to serve as the Council liaison to that effort
>  
> 
> Please let me know if you would like to add anything or have any questions
> with regard to these action items.
> Thank you.
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> Glen
>  
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat 
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org
>

Attachment: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014.docx
Description: Microsoft Office

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature