Re: [council] Enhancing ICANN Accountability | ICANN - Proposed Next Steps for the Process

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I understand why many think that we need 4 reps, and that seems like it
should be easy to agree with.

My thoughts go to parity.  Are we also arguing that all other groups
should have 4 (numerical parity), or are we saying each according to
their needs (some sort of social/organizational parity).  For example,
do we support that At-Large, which is organized around regions, should
get 5.  Needs based parity is ok with me, I just want to be clear.

I also am concerned that we seem to believe that it is impossible for
each house to find someone who can neutrally and equitably represent the
interests, needs and viewpoints of both sides of a house.  Though this
is perhaps more a question for the GNSO review.

avri