<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] FW: Enhancing ICANN Accountability | ICANN - Proposed Next Steps for the Process
- To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [council] FW: Enhancing ICANN Accountability | ICANN - Proposed Next Steps for the Process
- From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:10:29 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=key-systems.net; h=content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject :subject:to:mime-version:user-agent:from:from:date:date :message-id; s=dkim; t=1400839835; x=1401703835; bh=21ouVpKBVvuj TZR7weIQws7FWx+vmFUNrZO5TtsqiUU=; b=qYGIBs2rSidV5nclTy28o5a/vS0o R1zTY1EJjPZALtBBRLcmEJJMHj9aRHHyoYlE/NslXFgjYm2WUBsicxo6kHtMBy5f QkSWfm8DFZ86yF5zwk5kphs0jl4ltyOLhLSo1l3QIqI3Fo9C/0075XhtrVqJqY5m eXhrzU7mJPs+vsA=
- In-reply-to: <0a1e01cf7661$0f5c5b90$2e1512b0$@afilias.info>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CF8F1711.34AF1%david.olive@icann.org> <CF9B9B62.3524A%david.olive@icann.org> <0a1e01cf7661$0f5c5b90$2e1512b0$@afilias.info>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
Hi Jonathan,
I fully agree. Our current structure is not condusive to adequate
representation of our communities with only 2 representatives.
Volker
Am 23.05.2014 10:29, schrieb Jonathan Robinson:
All,
It is my view that the GNSO should reasonably expect to have four
representatives (one per SG) on this Working Group.
Please let me know if you think similarly or differently.
Jonathan
*From:*David Olive [mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx]
*Sent:* 16 May 2014 08:46
*To:* Jonathan Robinson; Byron Holland; Louie Lee;
heather.dryden@xxxxxxxx; Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; Patrik Fältström;
Lars-Johan Liman; Jun Murai
*Cc:* Theresa Swinehart; Samantha Eisner
*Subject:* FW: Enhancing ICANN Accountability | ICANN - Proposed Next
Steps for the Process
Dear SO-AC Chairs:
In follow up to ICANN's recent announcement on the Enhancing ICANN
Accountability review, part of the success of this group will be
through the SO and AC's identification of members to serve on the
Working Group. In contrast to the ATRT reviews and others, ICANN will
not be making community appointments to the group from a slate of
identified candidates; the community representation on this Working
Group is to be determined by the SO/AC leadership. We are hoping that
you can start consideration of membership from SO or AC that you are
leading. As ICANN is trying to align the timeline of the Enhancing
ICANN Accountability work to the IANA Stewardship Transition work, we
are hoping that we can have community representation identified in
advance of ICANN50 in London.
To help structure the work of the Working Group, ICANN has identified
a range of subject matter areas within which competency would be
helpful, including:
·Internet Technical Operations
·International Organizational Reviews
·Global Accountability Tools and Metrics
·Jurisprudence / Accountability Mechanism
·Internet Consumer Protection
·Economics (Marketplace and Competition)
·Global Ethics Frameworks
·Operational, Finance and Process
·Board Governance
·Transparency
·Risk Management
While we did not specify the full number of community members that
will be appointed to the Working Group, we are hopeful that each SO
and AC will consider identifying two representatives (and no more than
three) so that the Working Group is of a size that can perform its
work in an efficient manner. We also encourage the consideration of
the subject matters when identifying representatives.
If you have more questions about this process, please let Theresa
Swinehart or myself know.
Best regards, David
David A. Olive
Vice President, Policy Development Support
General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters --Istanbul
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct Line: +90.212.381.8727
Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611
Email: david.olive@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>
www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
*From: *David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>>
*Date: *Wednesday, May 7, 2014 12:47 AM
*To: *"soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>"
<soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>>
*Cc: *Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:theresa.swinehart@xxxxxxxxx>>
*Subject: *Enhancing ICANN Accountability | ICANN - Proposed Next
Steps for the Process
http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/enhancing-accountability
Proposed Next Steps for the Process
Establishing the ICANN Accountability Working Group:
At the ICANN meeting in Singapore, members of the community suggested
establishing a working group to address topics raised around ICANN
Accountability. To respond to both the community dialogues and
suggestions, an ICANN Accountability Working Group is proposed.
The leaders of ICANN's Supporting Organizations and Advisory
Committees will be responsible for appointment of community members to
the Working Group. Community members with skills in the subject matter
areas listed below are encouraged to have their names put forward by
the leadership of ICANN's Supporting Organizations and Advisory
Committees for participation in the Working Group before the end of
the comment and reply period. The Board may appoint liaisons to the
Working Group. ICANN staff will identify external experts in these
subject matter areas to join the Working Group and bring in new ideas.
The subject matter areas are:
* Internet Technical Operations
* International Organizational Reviews
* Global Accountability Tools and Metrics
* Jurisprudence / Accountability Mechanism
* Internet Consumer Protection
* Economics (Marketplace and Competition)
* Global Ethics Frameworks
* Operational, Finance and Process
* Board Governance
* Transparency
* Risk Management
After the public comment and reply period, the Working Group will
commence in time for the ICANN 50 Meeting. It's expected that
sub-working groups on specialized subject areas will be useful and
open to all including experts.
The ICANN Accountability Working Group would coordinate community
dialogue, including discussion on draft materials on the discussions
and proposed themes outlined above with regards to strengthening
ICANN's accountability to address the absence of its historical
contractual relationship to the U.S. Government and other identified
issues. One of the first tasks of the Working Group will be to
identify the issues that need to be solved. The ICANN Accountability
Working Group would prepare a draft report on issues identified
including whether measures are needed to strengthen ICANN's
accountability, and if so, the recommended time frames for development
of new or improved mechanisms, if any. The draft report would be
provided for public comment. The ICANN Accountability Working Group
would submit its final report to the ICANN Board. The Board would
immediately and publicly post the final report, consider whether to
adopt all or parts of it, and direct the CEO to implement those parts
it has accepted once that decision is made.
It is expected that the ICANN Accountability Working Group would
operate in an open, transparent and inclusive process, primarily
through remote participation opportunities, that would include:
* A website that would include a timeline of activities and events,
as well as all materials and communications from the working
group, and a full archive of all content provided and evaluated
throughout the process;
* A mailing list to ensure anyone can remain involved in the
activities and progress of the group; and,
* All meetings and phone conference would be open for stakeholders
to observe and transcripts and recordings would be posted.
Questions for Community Discussion:
As the next steps are being outlined and process finalized, ICANN is
collecting community input to help provide feedback to further the
work of the ICANN Accountability Working Group once it is comprised.
ICANN is now seeking community discussion on both the questions first
posed in March 2014 as well as some additional questions:
* What issues does the community identify as being core to
strengthening ICANN's overall accountability in the absence of its
historical contractual relationship to the U.S. Government?
* What should be the guiding principles to ensure that the notion of
accountability is understood and accepted globally? What are the
consequences if the ICANN Board is not being accountable to the
community? Is there anything that should be added to the Working
Group's mandate?
* Do the Affirmation of Commitments and the values expressed therein
need to evolve to support global acceptance of ICANN's
accountability and so, how?
* What are the means by which the Community is assured that ICANN is
meeting its accountability commitments?
* Are there other mechanisms that would better ensure that ICANN
lives up to its commitments?
* What additional comments would you like to share that could be of
use to the ICANN Accountability Working Group?
*Please provide your input on the questions above at
comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14@xxxxxxxxx>*
*Download a PDF of this document here
<http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/enhancing-accountability-06may14-en.pdf>
[PDF, 375 KB].*
David A. Olive
Vice President, Policy Development Support
General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters --Istanbul
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct Line: +90.212.381.8727
Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611
Email: david.olive@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>
www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede
Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|