<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Re: Letter from the NGPC Chair
All,
Confirming, Chair and Vice Chairs have a draft of the minute.
Will review asap.
Jonathan
From: Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 16 May 2014 17:45
To: James M. Bladel; John Berard; jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; avri@xxxxxxx;
vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Letter from the NGPC Chair
Hi James and everyone ? as they stand currently, the GNSO Operating
Procedures specify that an individual Councilor must provide an explanation
for an abstention on a vote, and may do so for either a Yes or No vote. Any
such explanation has to be recorded in the minutes of that meeting, and
draft minutes are to be produced within 8 days of a meeting. Following the
Chair and Vice-Chairs? initial vetting of the draft, Councilors may then
approve or object to the minutes prior to their posting.
I hope this helps.
Cheers
Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
* One World. One Internet. *
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, May 16, 2014 at 11:40 AM
To: John Berard <johnberard@xxxxxxx>, "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx"
<jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "avri@xxxxxxx" <avri@xxxxxxx>,
"vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Letter from the NGPC Chair
I tend to agree with John on this point, seeing as this is so far after the
fact.
But going forward (and I realize that time was short on this issue),
perhaps we could have given a few days to pen a ?minority statement? on this
(or any) motion. What are the rules & procedures around this.
Thanks?
J.
From: John Berard <johnberard@xxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, May 16, 2014 at 9:01
To: "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "avri@xxxxxxx"
<avri@xxxxxxx>, "vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Letter from the NGPC Chair
Jonathan, et. al.,
I think such a letter is a bad idea. No one is barred from speaking, either
individually or with the full-force of their constituency, but the vote
ought to be the sole and unified voice of the Council.
Berard
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 'Avri Doria' <avri@xxxxxxx>; 'Volker Greimann'
<vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, May 16, 2014 6:31 am
Subject: RE: [council] Re: Letter from the NGPC Chair
Avri / Volker,
Would you like me to write a short letter to the NGPC (which will then
become part of the formal record) indicating the voting?
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx <mailto:avri@xxxxxxx?> ]
Sent: 16 May 2014 14:00
To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Volker Greimann'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Letter from the NGPC Chair
Hi
'motion passed by majority'
is 'a bare fact'
Please do not indicate that this is requesting a spin.
thank you
avri
On 16-May-14 08:55, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> Thanks Avri & Volker,
>
>
>
> Good points and I?ll work with you to remedy in this case if possible
> and ensure that it is dealt with in future.
>
>
>
> I was sensitive to the point, but when expressing it in words in a
> draft of the letter, it felt to me as if I was putting a spin on it so
> I backed off and reported the bare facts.
>
>
>
> Note that, with this issue in mind, was the reason I referred the
> reader to the fact that a full discussion had taken place and that a
> record of that was available.
>
>
>
> ?Full records of the discussions and the detail of the issues raised
> therein are available to the NGPC, or other interested parties,
> through mail archives, meeting recordings and transcripts.?
>
>
>
> Not quite as clear as you may have liked I do understand but I was
> aware of the subtleties and sensitivities here and attempted to reflect
them.
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:*Volker Greimann [mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?> ]
> *Sent:* 16 May 2014 12:56
> *To:* Avri Doria; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Re: Letter from the NGPC Chair
>
>
>
> Agreed. We should make it a point to clearly deliniate the votes in
> each communication to the board in the future, i.e. not only include
> the complete voting record, but also who voted how.
>
> In some cases, we may also want to allow the dissenting groups to
> include a dissenting opinion with the submission of the motion.
>
> Volker
>
> Am 16.05.2014 13:44, schrieb Avri Doria:
>
> Hi,
>
> BTW I m glad Alan brought this up. At the time I was displeased
> that the letter did not give the vote count, but was distracted and
> did not say anything at the time.
>
> It allows the reader to assume that it was passed by a large margin,
> or even super majority as most things sent by the council, as
> opposed to having the barest of majorities.
>
> I think the letter should have given the full results.
>
> It is my fault as well, as I should have made a statement when I
> voted against this. A mistake I will try to avoid in the future.
>
> I still this this is a sad day for the GNSO.
>
> avri
>
> On 16-May-14 05:02, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>
> Thanks Glen and well-spotted Alan.
>
>
>
> Correct, the body of the letter contains the correct
> resolution but the link
>
> is to the (original) motion.
>
> I thought the motion would be changed / updated to that which was
voted on.
>
>
>
> I'll talk with Glen and we'll get it fixed by one route or
another.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx?> ]
>
> Sent: 16 May 2014 09:33
>
> To: Alan Greenberg; jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx?> >;
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx?> >
>
> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
>
> Subject: RE: [council] Re: Letter from the NGPC Chair
>
>
>
> Alan and Jonathan,
>
>
>
> If you like, I will ask Web admin to fix the link, if they
> can, by changing
>
> it from the motions page to the resolutions page?
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201405
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Glen
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
>
> De : owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx?> >
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx?> ] De
>
> la part de Alan Greenberg Envoyé : vendredi 16 mai 2014 06:31 À :
>
> jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx?> >;
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx?> > Objet : Re: [council]
Re:
>
> Letter from the NGPC Chair
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan, the letter was published by ICANN today, and I
> noticed a small
>
> error. The letter includes a link described as "The full text
> of the motion
>
> passed is available here". The link, however, points to the
> Motions page on
>
> the Wiki which is the original motion going into the meeting
> and not the
>
> final version.
>
>
>
> The version appended to the text of the letter is the correct
> one, so the
>
> impact of the error is likely to be small.
>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> At 09/05/2014 05:29 AM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
>
> FYI. Please see attached for letter sent to the NGPC today.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
>
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
>
>
> Volker A. Greimann
>
> - Rechtsabteilung -
>
>
>
> Key-Systems GmbH
>
> Im Oberen Werk 1
>
> 66386 St. Ingbert
>
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
>
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
>
> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?> >
>
>
>
> Web: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net> /
> www.RRPproxy.net <http://www.RRPproxy.net>
>
> www.domaindiscount24.com <http://www.domaindiscount24.com> /
> www.BrandShelter.com <http://www.BrandShelter.com>
>
>
>
> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
>
> www.facebook.com/KeySystems <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>
>
> www.twitter.com/key_systems <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
>
>
>
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
>
> Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
>
> Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
>
>
>
> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
>
> www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu>
>
>
>
> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese
Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per
E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Volker A. Greimann
>
> - legal department -
>
>
>
> Key-Systems GmbH
>
> Im Oberen Werk 1
>
> 66386 St. Ingbert
>
> Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
>
> Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
>
> Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?> >
>
>
>
> Web: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net> /
> www.RRPproxy.net <http://www.RRPproxy.net>
>
> www.domaindiscount24.com <http://www.domaindiscount24.com> /
> www.BrandShelter.com <http://www.BrandShelter.com>
>
>
>
> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay
updated:
>
> www.facebook.com/KeySystems <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>
>
> www.twitter.com/key_systems <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
>
>
>
> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
>
> Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
>
> V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
>
>
>
> Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
>
> www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu>
>
>
>
> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it
is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify
the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|