<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 08:52:34 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac9t+e+RV0rfU9p6QP2nahGM0YEdoQ==
- Thread-topic: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
Summary
Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would like
to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to members of
the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is expected to reflect
that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other Supporting
Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer should they decide
so.
Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party
The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner and the
Board's Structural Improvements Committee;
2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[1];
3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and comments to
any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping to ensure the draft
report issued by the independent examiner accurately reflects the GNSO
structure, scope and dynamics;
5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation Plan and
champion implementation of improvement activities;
6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
participation.
Volunteer Requirements
The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include members
representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the make-up of the
GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry Stakeholder Group, up
to 3 representatives from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, up to 2
representatives from the Nominating Committee appointees, up to 2
representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2 representative from the
Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives from the Internet
Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6 representatives from
the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to the possibility for other
SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The activities of the GNSO Review
Working Party will be conducted in an open and fully transparent manner.
Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective criteria would
be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to devote
sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to be 50 - 80 hours
within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately. Commitment to and
compliance with ICANN's bottom-up, multistakeholder model, and accountability
and transparency ethics are a requirement.
Submitting candidates
Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed above.
Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to fill all the
slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names of the proposed
candidates are submitted by Monday 19 May at the latest as work has already
commenced. The names of the proposed candidates should be submitted to the GNSO
Secretariat
(gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>).
Background
The objective of the GNSO Review[2] is to examine organizational effectiveness
of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO Council, GNSO Working
Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies). The review scheduled to
begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly scoped based on objective and
quantifiable criteria provided to the independent examiner.
Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation from the
broader community are important components of this review process. As discussed
in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements Committee of the Board
(SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working Party be assembled to function
as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner and the SIC, to provide
input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment, coordinate interviews and
objectively supply clarification and responses to the draft findings and
recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes action on
it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review Working Party is expected to coordinate
with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation Plan and champion
implementation of improvement activities.
Please see the recent
announcement<http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>
about the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
Further Information
Forming GNSO Review Working Party Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review
Working Party
Summary
Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would like
to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to members of
the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is expected to reflect
that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other Supporting
Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer should they decide
so.
Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party
The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner and the
Board's Structural Improvements Committee;
2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[3];
3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and comments to
any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping to ensure the draft
report issued by the independent examiner accurately reflects the GNSO
structure, scope and dynamics;
5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation Plan and
champion implementation of improvement activities;
6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
participation.
Volunteer Requirements
The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include members
representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the make-up of the
GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry Stakeholder Group, up
to 3 representatives from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, up to 2
representatives from the Nominating Committee appointees, up to 2
representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2 representative from the
Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives from the Internet
Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6 representatives from
the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to the possibility for other
SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The activities of the GNSO Review
Working Party will be conducted in an open and fully transparent manner.
Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective criteria would
be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to devote
sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to be 50 - 80 hours
within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately. Commitment to and
compliance with ICANN's bottom-up, multi-stakeholder model, and accountability
and transparency ethics are a requirement.
Submitting candidates
Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed above.
Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to fill all the
slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names of the proposed
candidates are submitted by Monday 19 May at the latest as work has already
commenced. The names of the proposed candidates should be submitted to the GNSO
Secretariat
(gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>).
Background
The objective of the GNSO Review[4] is to examine organizational effectiveness
of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO Council, GNSO Working
Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies). The review scheduled to
begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly scoped based on objective and
quantifiable criteria provided to the independent examiner.
Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation from the
broader community are important components of this review process. As discussed
in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements Committee of the Board
(SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working Party be assembled to function
as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner and the SIC, to provide
input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment, coordinate interviews and
objectively supply clarification and responses to the draft findings and
recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes action on
it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review Working Party is expected to coordinate
with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation Plan and champion
implementation of improvement activities.
Please see the recent
announcement<http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>
about the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
Further Information
· Forming GNSO Review Working
Party<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf>
· GNSO Review
Webinar<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm.>
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
________________________________
[1] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize feedback
from members of the GNSO community - a "self-review" relative to objective and
quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN organizations, Board
and staff also may offer feedback.
[2] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN's
Bylaws<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>.
[3] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize feedback
from members of the GNSO community - a "self-review" relative to objective and
quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN organizations, Board
and staff also may offer feedback.
[4] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN's
Bylaws<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|