RE: [council] draft motion - response to NGPC letter - Rec 19/Spec 13

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

The motion has been posted on the Motion's Wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+8+May+2014

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen

Glen de Saint Géry 
GNSO Secretariat 
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://gnso.icann.org

-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la 
part de Thomas Rickert
Envoyé : lundi 28 avril 2014 21:35
À : GNSO Council List; GNSO Secretariat
Objet : [council] draft motion - response to NGPC letter - Rec 19/Spec 13

All,
please find attached a draft motion in response to the NGPC's letter with 
respect to Specification 13.

We may need to continue our discussion but one clear message is that it is 
important to respond in a timely way to the deadline set by the NGPC.  
Therefore, any associated motion must meet the documents and motions deadline 
today for the upcoming GNSO Council telephone conference.

The proposed motion encompasses the following messages, which I have heard and 
read so far:

- There is an inconsistency between Recommendation 9 and Spec 13.
- There is an understanding for and recognition of the .BRAND Registries'
request.
- The Council should respond to the NGPC's request and - in case an 
inconsistency is existent - make a constructive proposal on how to deal with 
this. 

Therefore, I have included additional clauses to state that the Council does 
not oppose the implementation of all of Spec 13 now, but requests that the 
Board make sure that appropriate safeguards are put in place in future rounds. 
Also, I have included a clause on the Council reserving the right to initiate a 
PDP if need be. 

I hope this is an acceptable compromise and I am more than happy to discuss 
this further. 

Thanks,
Thomas