<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] FW: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13
- From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:01:00 +0100
- Cc: <philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <martinsutton@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <3B6F15E4F09C4236930A46C9E1E2B6C4@ZaparazziL11>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: Afilias
- References: <3B6F15E4F09C4236930A46C9E1E2B6C4@ZaparazziL11>
- Reply-to: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHBR5ztVOVJYllzN7FPwFruyTlWRpsuYVsA
All,
Please see note below from Philip Sheppard.
Jonathan
From: BRG [mailto:philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 14 April 2014 17:03
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13
Jonathan,
I noted that Klaus on the Council list asked this question:
BTW: what happens if a brand gTLD decides down the road to give up
exclusivity and become available for general use, at some point that might
make perfect business sense.
As I cannot post to Council, perhaps you would do so for me.
Its a legitimate question and one also asked by ICANN legal staff.
The answer is in other provisions of Spec 13. In the circumstances described
by Klaus, all of Spec 13 would immediately no longer apply, and the default
RA would apply instead.
Philip
Philip Sheppard
Director General
Brand Registry Group
www.brandregistrygroup.org <http://www.brandregistrygroup.org/>
Skype phsheppard
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|