<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Regarding the Board's process for reviewing the GNSO's policy recommendations on the Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs
- To: "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Regarding the Board's process for reviewing the GNSO's policy recommendations on the Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs
- From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:31:55 +0100
- In-reply-to: <263EE96C7DADD44CB3D5A07DBD41D0E862A4101D@bne3-0001mitmbx.corp.mit>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: Afilias
- References: <263EE96C7DADD44CB3D5A07DBD41D0E862A4101D@bne3-0001mitmbx.corp.mit>
- Reply-to: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHjjerpYD17WPT+dpuHy88QDK/k+5rT3Lsw
Bruce,
Thank-you for this. Your involvement seems timely and its very helpful to be
kept informed generally.
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 28 March 2014 04:33
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Regarding the Board's process for reviewing the GNSO's
policy recommendations on the Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All
gTLDs
Hello All,
Attached are the slides used in the public forum yesterday. I edited the
last slide to make clear that the Board may convene a meeting (in response
to Jeff Neumann's question), and that ALAC would also be invited as one of
the ICANN SO/ACs that had provided input on the topic (in response to
Sébastien Bachollet's request).
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|