<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] ICANN & NTIA
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] ICANN & NTIA
- From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:14:25 +0100
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <532A8E3A.1080807@acm.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <532A8E3A.1080807@acm.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Avri,
I would very much support the idea of equipping Jonathan with a robust mandate.
Best,
Thomas
=============
thomas-rickert.tel
+49.228.74.898.0
> Am 20.03.2014 um 07:44 schrieb Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I know it is too late for a motion, but will there be an opportunity to get
> 'sense of the council/gnso' on support for ICANN in this NTIA process?
>
> Personally I would like to see Jonathan able to support the ongoing work,
> without committing to any particular endpoint, but in the name of the GNSO of
> which he is chair.
>
> I know we have an agenda of very important issues, but I beleive we cannot
> afford to ignore this milestone in Internet governance without push ourselves
> further into irrelevancy.
>
> avrti
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|