Re: [council] Draft Singapore schedule
And it is due to the report that we have given the JIG 30 minutes rather than the 15 that most WGs have for been allotted. Is that time sufficient, or should we expand it? Regards David On 26 Feb 2014, at 1:55 am, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thomas, as the JIG has been requested to provide the GNSO Council with > suggestions on how to deal with IDN Variants and universal acceptance and > deliver these suggestions to the GNSO Council by the ICANN Singapore > meeting, it was envisioned that this conversation could happen in that > slot (Saturday from 11.30 - 12.00) but maybe that could be made more > explicit? > > Best regards, > > Marika > > On 25/02/14 18:35, "Thomas Rickert" <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Thanks for your work on this, David! >> >> I would very much like to discuss the issue of universal acceptance. One >> might say that this is an issue for others to resolve, but ICANN will >> likely be seen as a responsible party for not having taken sufficient >> steps to ensure new gTLDs "work". Since the original policy >> recommendations have been made by the GNSO, it appears to be appropriate >> for the Council to follow-up on this. >> >> Thomas >> >> >> Am 25.02.2014 um 16:35 schrieb David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >>> Please find attached a draft schedule for GNSO activities for the >>> Singapore meeting. >>> Please understand that, though interactions with senior ICANN staff >>> and the board have to contend with very busy schedules, and so may be >>> awkward to change, this is very much a draft schedule, presented for >>> Council discussion and input - please feel free to suggest additional >>> items, or remove them. You'll notice that 15 minutes per WG fills up a >>> fair bit of our schedule, and we have allocated 30 minutes for some - >>> comments on this appreciated. >>> I very much appreciate your input either on list, or on the Council >>> call. >>> >>> One item I'll note isn't currently on the schedule - the RSSAC is >>> meeting at the Singapore meeting, and this is very unusual. We currently >>> don't have any RSSAC/GNSO interaction scheduled - if council members >>> think this would be valuable, please say so ASAP. Such interaction would >>> have to be from Monday to Wednesday. >>> Regards >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> >>> <Singapore PUBLIC Draft Agenda v3 (2).xlsx> >> > > <default.xml> Attachment:
smime.p7s
|