ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO

  • To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO
  • From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:11:29 -0700
  • Cc: "Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <CF2BC939.4AC17%jbladel@godaddy.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: MailAPI 24838

James,
 
Yes, we should include all, but the ball has to start rolling somewhere.  I 
figure we can do that.
 
Berard
 
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a 
bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2/20/14 1:01 pm
To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "John Berard" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

 Also think this is worth of discussion, but should include other SO/ACs in an 
effort to provide a “360” review.
 
J.
 
 
From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 13:35 
 To: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the 
ICANN CEO
 
hi John,  
i sense a certain irony in your reference to crowdsourcing, but i went ahead 
and circulated your proposal amongst the ISPCP - initial reactions are 
positive.  i personally think it's a great idea.
 
mikey
 

  On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:28 AM, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

  All,
 
I think the next meeting of the ICANN, scheduled for London, marks two years of 
Fadi Chehade's term as the organization's President and CEO.  In light of the 
interest driven by the Strategy Panels in what is called crowd sourcing, I 
wonder if we should consider instigating a performance review of the executive 
using that method.
 
We can announce the initiative in Singapore and prepare a report for the London 
meeting.  The standing for the Council is the growing executive influence over 
policy, looking no further than the rise of appointed strategy panels in lieu 
of community-based working groups.
 
What is your view?
 
Cheers,
 
Berard

 
 

 

 
 PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: 
OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>