ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Proposed Review Mechanism to Address Perceived Inconsistent Expert Determinations on String Confusion Objections

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Proposed Review Mechanism to Address Perceived Inconsistent Expert Determinations on String Confusion Objections
  • From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 02:55:29 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac8nndyAUSaHT/+4Q3OsUXsO3LP2JQ==
  • Thread-topic: Proposed Review Mechanism to Address Perceived Inconsistent Expert Determinations on String Confusion Objections

Hello All,

I CANN has opened up a public comment process on a Proposed Review Mechanism to 
Address Perceived Inconsistent Expert Determinations on String Confusion 
Objections.

See;  
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/sco-framework-principles-11feb14-en.htm
 

I have attached the proposal for easy reference.

It is also available here:

http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/proposed-sco-framework-principles-11feb14-en.pdf
 

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin

Attachment: proposed-sco-framework-principles-11feb14-en.pdf
Description: proposed-sco-framework-principles-11feb14-en.pdf



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>