<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed Review Mechanism to Address Perceived Inconsistent Expert Determinations on String Confusion Objections
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed Review Mechanism to Address Perceived Inconsistent Expert Determinations on String Confusion Objections
- From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 02:55:29 +0000
- Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac8nndyAUSaHT/+4Q3OsUXsO3LP2JQ==
- Thread-topic: Proposed Review Mechanism to Address Perceived Inconsistent Expert Determinations on String Confusion Objections
Hello All,
I CANN has opened up a public comment process on a Proposed Review Mechanism to
Address Perceived Inconsistent Expert Determinations on String Confusion
Objections.
See;
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/sco-framework-principles-11feb14-en.htm
I have attached the proposal for easy reference.
It is also available here:
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/proposed-sco-framework-principles-11feb14-en.pdf
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
Attachment:
proposed-sco-framework-principles-11feb14-en.pdf
Description: proposed-sco-framework-principles-11feb14-en.pdf
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|