ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Request for extension of time for IGO-INGO Issue Report on Curative Rights Protection


(dropped the Cc:s)

Hi,

no objection to record on my part either.
But a council-newbie question about working practice: In the council, when someone, chair or whomever, says 'if there is no objection' does that mean we all have to let the list know that we have no objection? Or may we passively say nothing if we have no objection? 

Is there a time limit on such no-objection 'calls'?

Thanks

avri


On 07-Jan-14 09:23, Reed, Daniel A wrote:

Fine with me.

Dan

*From:*owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Amr Elsadr
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:28 AM
*To:* Thomas Rickert
*Cc:* Winterfeldt, Brian J.; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: [council] Request for extension of time for IGO-INGO
Issue Report on Curative Rights Protection

No objections on my part either. Good luck to the staff members working
on putting the report together.

Thanks.

Amr

On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:



Mary and Brian,

I have no objection either.

Thomas

Am 07.01.2014 um 05:02 schrieb "Winterfeldt, Brian J."
<brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>:



Dear Mary:

Thank you for the heads up.  The IPC has no objection to this extension.

Best regards,

Brian

*Brian J. Winterfeldt
*Head of Internet Practice
*Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
*2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118
p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244
brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>/www.kattenlaw.com
<http://www.kattenlaw.com/>

    *From:*Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>
    *Date:*January 6, 2014 at 11:15:20 AM EST
    *To:*"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
    <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
    *Subject:**[council] Request for extension of time for IGO-INGO
    Issue Report on Curative Rights Protection*

    Dear Councilors,

    We trust that you enjoyed a merry and festive holiday break, and
    extend a warm welcome back to you for the Council activities for 2014!

    As you will recall, the Council approved all the consensus
    recommendations made by the IGO-INGO PDP Working Group at the
    Council meeting in Buenos Aires on 20 November 2013. One of these
    recommendations was for an Issue Report relating to possible
    modifications to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and
    the Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) process in order to enable
    protected IGOs and INGOs to access and utilize these curative rights
    protection mechanisms.

    Staff has been engaged in preparing the Preliminary Issue Report, as
    requested; however, due to the holiday break and the need for
    internal coordination of several questions posed by the issue under
    consideration, we find that we cannot complete the full report
    within the 45 calendar day requirement specified in the GNSO PDP
    Manual. As a result, I hereby write to request an extension of the
    time period. My expectation is that staff will be able to complete
    and publish the full Preliminary Issue Report before the end of
    January 2014 for public comment, following which a Final Issue
    Report will be prepared and submitted to the GNSO Council for your
    review and action.

    Please let me know if there are any objections to the requested
    extension. Thank you.

    Cheers

    Mary

    Mary Wong

    Senior Policy Director

    Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

    Telephone: +1 603 574 4892

    Email:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>

    * One World. One Internet. *

===========================================================

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the 
Internal Revenue

Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used 
and cannot be used

by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on 
the taxpayer.

===========================================================

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive

use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is

proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law.  If you

are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, 
copying, disclosure or

distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or 
sanction.  Please notify

the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and 
delete the original

message without making any copies.

===========================================================

NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability 
partnership that has

elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).

===========================================================
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>