RE: [council] DSSA -- broadening its exposure

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mikey,

First of all let me say that I didn't find your contributions clumsy and, even 
if I did, that would make me feel more at ease with my own clumsy interventions 
over the years.

Second, I don't think there is any reason why the GNSO via the Council could 
propose a webinar about the DSSA topic.  Before doing that though, I would 
suggest three things: 1) develop an outline of the purpose and content of the 
webinar; 2) make sure the timing is right in particular with regard to the 
Board efforts; 3) survey the community to determine if people would participate.

Chuck

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 6:34 PM
To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GNSO
Subject: [council] DSSA -- broadening its exposure

hi all,

thanks for putting up with my somewhat clumsy handling of the DSSA motion on 
the call today.  shutting that WG down was pretty tough for me and my 
subconscious was hard at work trying to prevent me from shepherding that motion 
through.  thanks for putting up with my no-so-smooth treatment Avri.  i agree 
with your "with disappointment" caveat on your vote.

i wanted to follow up on one point that was raised.  i think it would be GREAT 
if the fabulous work that the WG did, and their suggestions as to a way 
forward, could get a little more "bandwidth" in the GNSO community.  is there a 
mechanism whereby i could sponsor a webinar about that?  or do something else?  
i don't really know the rules of the road well enough to know how to proceed 
and would welcome ideas.

thanks,

mikey


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: 
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, 
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)