RE: [council] CWG on Internet Govenrance Issues

["Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Chuck,

 

Good point.  I believe they should have seen them but may not have looked in
any detail.

 

In any case, I'll follow up with due care.

 

Jonathan

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 27 November 2013 19:31
To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] CWG on Internet Govenrance Issues

 

Jonathan,

 

Before offering use of the CWG principles as they stand, it might be a good
idea for you to talk to the chairs of other SOs and the ACs to see if they
would support that idea or if they would want to modify those principles in
any way.  Some of them probably haven't seen those principles so they should
be sent to them first.  An early action item for the group might be to
review those principles and decide whether they would work or whether they
may need to be modified for this effort.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:04 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] CWG on Internet Govenrance Issues

 

All,

 

At the Council meeting wrap-up in Buenos Aires, we talked about GNSO
participation in the CWG on internet governance and the Council and/or GNSO
Council chair's otential role.

 

At the time, I don't believe we were aware of the proposed role of ALAC /
NCSG as co-ordinators.  

 

I think (from a Council perspective) we should probably now await the call
for further participation and respond to that, but I am open to any other
suggestions.

 

We could offer the CWG principles as they currently stand?

 

 

Jonathan