Re: [council] Final GAC communique
Nonetheless it is sad and I will say that I find it interesting to show respect to the GNSO's PDP work by working on ways to engage and then completely ignore work that is done in PDPs which is relevant to what they are deliberating. Thomas Am 21.11.2013 um 17:17 schrieb "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Remember that they never thought we should be considering this. :( > > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Thomas Rickert > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:11 PM > To: Glen de Saint Géry > Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [council] Final GAC communique > > > All, > sadly, the GAC communique includes Advise on IGO/INGOs, but does not mention > the GNSO's PDP WG or the motion that passed. > > Thomas > > ============= > thomas-rickert.tel > +49.228.74.898.0 > >> Am 21.11.2013 um 16:57 schrieb Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> FYI >> >> Attached please find the finalised GAC communique from Buenos Aires. >> >> The communique will be posted on the GAC Website later today. >> >> Glen de Saint Géry >> GNSO Secretariat >> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://gnso.icann.org >> >> >> >> <FINAL_Buenos_Aires_GAC_Communique_20131120.pdf> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gac mailing list >> gac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac > > > Attachment:
signature.asc
|