ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Questions for the CEO

  • To: Magaly Pazello <magaly.pazello@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Questions for the CEO
  • From: David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 18:04:19 -0300
  • Cc: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <CA+dOKfAwt=1ov4PAqbDZWhr=gVHW13pdAGgCGGhHgzoP5TD-5Q@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <u4p0f5t9s3dxa75vil18owj6.1384634552610@email.android.com> <CA+dOKfAwt=1ov4PAqbDZWhr=gVHW13pdAGgCGGhHgzoP5TD-5Q@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yes, and the 'summit' naming has generated some heat on some other fora, so it 
isn't a matter of naming only - summit implies a high level intergovernmental 
event to some. 

Regards

        David

On 16 Nov 2013, at 6:01 pm, Magaly Pazello <magaly.pazello@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi John!
> Brazilian gov is not calling "summit" the meeting next year the oficial name 
> is Multstakholder Conference on the Future of Internet Governance.
> Magaly
> 
> On Saturday, November 16, 2013, John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > What do governments and I-stars mean by "accelerating the globalization of 
> > ICANN and IANA"?
> >
> > What’s the test to avoid "scope creep" into issues outside of ICANN’s 
> > mandate?
> >
> > What’s the process ICANN could use to involve bottom-up work on answering 
> > the challenge of Montevideo, Brasil Summit, and ITU?
> >
> > Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Please respond to this thread with any question/s you propose to raise 
> > tomorrow



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>