ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 31 October 2013 at 11:00 UTC.

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 31 October 2013 at 11:00 UTC.
  • From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:13:49 -0700
  • Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac7PWtOg1N0lY4AdR3OWZYoDq7fmSw==
  • Thread-topic: Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 31 October 2013 at 11:00 UTC.

Dear Councillors,
Please find the proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 31 October 2013 at 
11:00 UTC.
http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-31oct13-en.htm
The agenda is also posted on the Wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+31+October+2013
And the motions are posted at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures 
approved 13 September 2012 for the GNSO Council and updated.
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13jun13-en.pdf >
For convenience:

 *   An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided 
in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
 *   An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee 
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
Meeting Times 11:00 
UTC<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=council+meeting&iso=20131031T11&ah=2>
http://tinyurl.com/py4mo84

Coordinated Universal Time 11:00 UTC
04:00 Los Angeles; 07:00 Washington; 11:00 London; 12:00 Paris; 00:00 
Wellington next day

Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councillors 
should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.

GNSO Council meeting audio cast
http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u

Item 1: Administrative matters (10 mins)

1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Statement of interest updates
1.3 Review/amend agenda
1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO 
Operating Procedures:
Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 10 October 
2013<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg15059.html> will 
be posted as approved on 23 October 2013

Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (10 mins)
Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics
Include review of Projects 
List<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf> and Action 
List<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>.
Comments or questions arising.


Item 3: Consent agenda (5 mins)

Item 4: MOTION - To approve a charter for the Translation and Transliteration 
of Contact Information PDP Working Group (10 mins)
On 13 June 2013 the GNSO Council initiated a Policy Development Process (PDP) 
on the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information and decided to 
create a PDP Working Group for the purposes of fulfilling the requirements of 
the PDP.  Following a call for volunteers, a Drafting Team was formed and its 
members have developed a charter for consideration by the GNSO Council.  The 
drafting team has submitted the charter and so the GNSO Council, having 
reviewed the charter, will vote on whether to approve it as submitted by the 
Drafting Team.
4.1 - Review motion 
1<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013>
4.2 - Discussion
4.3 - Next steps
Item 5: MOTION - Adoption of the Thick Whois Policy Development Process Final 
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/thick-final-21oct13-en.pdf> and 
Recommendations (10 mins)
The Final Report on Thick 
Whois<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/thick-final-21oct13-en.pdf> has 
been prepared as required by the GNSO PDP in the ICANN Bylaws. The Final Report 
is based on the Initial Report of 21 June 2013 and has been updated to reflect 
the review and analysis of the Public Comments received by the Thick Whois 
Working Group, in addition to further deliberations. The report is submitted to 
the GNSO Council for its consideration. The conclusions and recommendations for 
next steps on the issues included in this PDP are outlined in Section 7 of the 
report.
5.1 - Review 
motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013>
 2
5.2 - Discussion
5.3 - Next steps
Item 6: MOTION - To approve a charter for the Standing Committee on GNSO 
Improvements Implementation (SCI) (10 mins)

The GNSO Council approved the original charter for the Standing Committee on 
GNSO Improvements Implementation (SCI) in 2011.  Recently, the SCI determined 
that the Charter no longer reflected its current role as a standing committee, 
and furthermore did not contain procedures for selecting its Chair and 
Vice-Chair. The SCI requested guidance from the GNSO Council as to how to 
proceed with revisions to the Charter and at its meeting on 05 September 2013 
the GNSO Council endorsed the SCI as a standing committee and further requested 
that the SCI proceed to revise the Charter as it may deem necessary, with the 
exception of the section on Decision Making.  The SCI has since revised the 
Charter to reflect its role as a standing committee and to include procedures 
to select the Chair and Vice Chair.

6.1 - Review 
motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013>
 3
6.2 - Discussion
6.3 - Next steps

Item 7: MOTION - A charter for the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation PDP 
WG (10 mins)
ICANN staff prepared a 
paper<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/negotiations-conclusion-16sep13-en.pdf>
 to summarise the outcomes of the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) 
negotiations in order to set the scene for subsequent associated policy 
development work to be managed by the Council.  This is an ICANN Board 
initiated PDP.  The staff paper contained a draft charter for the PDP WG and 
the Council has discussed this.  Refinements to the charter have been proposed 
as has a title for the PDP WG. Here the Council needs to decide to move ahead 
with the revised draft charter prepared by staff or to institute a drafting 
team to revise and / or develop the PDP WG charter.
7.1 
Motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013>
 4
7.2 Discussion
7.2 Next steps

Item 8: INPUT & DISCUSSION - Prospective improvements to the Policy Development 
Process (10 mins)
The Council is committed to on-going enhancements to the methods of working of 
the Council and the work initiated and managed by the Council. The PDP process 
is a cornerstone of policy making within the GNSO and, as such, the work of the 
Council.  The PDP outcomes and associated processes are the subject of focus 
and attention both within the GNSO and the broader ICANN Community. The Council 
has previously discussed a paper prepared by ICANN 
staff<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/pdp-improvements-22aug13-en.pdf> on 
potential improvements to the PDP process.  The discussion is now encapsulated 
in a table form and further work needs to be done on reviewing the table and 
agreeing concrete next steps.
8.1 - Review of table of prospective PDP 
Improvements<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/pdp-improvements-table-23sep13-en.pdf>
 (Marika Konings)
8.2 - Discussion
8.3 - Next steps
Item 9: DISCUSSION - Policy issues surrounding string confusion (10 mins)
The Council previously discussed issues associated with the string confusion 
decisions that have been taken e.g. relating to plural and singular versions of 
the same term and the apparently contradictory decisions on identical strings.  
The Council agreed to write to the ICANN board and new gTLD programme 
committee<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/robinson-to-crocker-chalaby-18sep13-en.pdf>
 and to consider appropriate additional action. Further, the Council 
subsequently (10 October 2013) agreed that additional action will be contingent 
on receiving advice from ICANN legal counsel as to whether or not any 
additional GNSO work on the topic will have the potential to be used in a 
timely and effective manner within the new gTLD programme. Here the Council 
needs to hear if any such advice, requested via ICANN policy staff, has been 
forthcoming and, if so, what further action to take.
9.1 - Update on advice received
9.2 - Discussion
9.2 - Next steps
Item 10: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Protection of IGO-INGO Identifiers in all gTLDs 
Policy Development Process (10 mins)

The WG Chair will provide an update on status of WG deliberations and the 
public 
comment<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/igo-ingo-final-20sep13-en.htm>
 solicitation process for the draft Final 
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-20sep13-en.pdf>.  This 
PDP WG was formed to develop a set of policy recommendations to address the 
issue of whether and if so, what types of protections should be provided for 
the identifiers of certain IGOs and INGOs including the RCRC and IOC at the top 
and second levels in all gTLDs.  For further information please see: 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/igo-ingo.
10.1 - Review of proposed WG recommendations (Thomas Rickert)
10.2 - Discussion
10.3 - Next steps
Item 11: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Planning for Buenos Aires (10 mins)
Making the most out of the face-to-face meeting time available at the ICANN 
Meeting in Buenos Aires will take planning.  GNSO Council Vice Chair, 
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben has again volunteered to lead this and will be working with 
the Council and staff on this effort.
Here the Council has the opportunity to feed into plans and provide input based 
on past experience.  Included in this item will be the opportunity to shape the 
approach to and substance of the Council's proposed meetings with other groups 
in such as the CCNSO, the GAC and the ICANN board.
11.1 - Update (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
11.2 - Discussion
11.3 - Next steps
Item 12:  Any Other Business (5 mins)


Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO 
Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or 
other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting 
thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than 
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in 
Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an 
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than 
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO 
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative 
vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) 
of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an 
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved 
under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter 
through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final 
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a 
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO 
Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups 
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting 
Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of 
the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority 
vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the 
ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the 
GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council 
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority 
of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures 
4.4<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf>)
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council 
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced 
time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In 
exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may 
reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided 
such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes 
according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for 
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by 
telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become 
available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a 
quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local time between October and March, Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 11:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA 
(PDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>) 
UTC-7+1DST 04:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-4+1DST 07:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+1DST 09:00
Montevideo, Uruguay 
(UYST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/uyst.html>) 
UTC-3+1DST 09:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 11:00
Abuja, Nigeria 
(WAT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/africa/wat.html>)
 UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Bonn, Germany (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Stockholm, Sweden (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+2+0DST 13:00
Ramat Hasharon, 
Israel(IST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/ist-israel.html>)
 UTC+2+0DST 13:00
Karachi, Pakistan 
(PKT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/pkt.html> 
) UTC+5+0DST 16:00
Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 19:00
Perth, Australia 
(WST<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html>) 
UTC+8+0DST 19:00
Wellington, New Zealand 
(NZDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/pacific/nzdt.html>
 ) UTC+12+1DST 00:00 (next day)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DST starts/ends on last Sunday of March 2014, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with 
exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com - http://tinyurl

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>