<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 31 October 2013 at 11:00 UTC.
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 31 October 2013 at 11:00 UTC.
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:13:49 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac7PWtOg1N0lY4AdR3OWZYoDq7fmSw==
- Thread-topic: Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 31 October 2013 at 11:00 UTC.
Dear Councillors,
Please find the proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 31 October 2013 at
11:00 UTC.
http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-31oct13-en.htm
The agenda is also posted on the Wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+31+October+2013
And the motions are posted at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures
approved 13 September 2012 for the GNSO Council and updated.
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13jun13-en.pdf >
For convenience:
* An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided
in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
* An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
Meeting Times 11:00
UTC<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=council+meeting&iso=20131031T11&ah=2>
http://tinyurl.com/py4mo84
Coordinated Universal Time 11:00 UTC
04:00 Los Angeles; 07:00 Washington; 11:00 London; 12:00 Paris; 00:00
Wellington next day
Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councillors
should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.
GNSO Council meeting audio cast
http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
Item 1: Administrative matters (10 mins)
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Statement of interest updates
1.3 Review/amend agenda
1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO
Operating Procedures:
Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 10 October
2013<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg15059.html> will
be posted as approved on 23 October 2013
Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (10 mins)
Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics
Include review of Projects
List<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf> and Action
List<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>.
Comments or questions arising.
Item 3: Consent agenda (5 mins)
Item 4: MOTION - To approve a charter for the Translation and Transliteration
of Contact Information PDP Working Group (10 mins)
On 13 June 2013 the GNSO Council initiated a Policy Development Process (PDP)
on the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information and decided to
create a PDP Working Group for the purposes of fulfilling the requirements of
the PDP. Following a call for volunteers, a Drafting Team was formed and its
members have developed a charter for consideration by the GNSO Council. The
drafting team has submitted the charter and so the GNSO Council, having
reviewed the charter, will vote on whether to approve it as submitted by the
Drafting Team.
4.1 - Review motion
1<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013>
4.2 - Discussion
4.3 - Next steps
Item 5: MOTION - Adoption of the Thick Whois Policy Development Process Final
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/thick-final-21oct13-en.pdf> and
Recommendations (10 mins)
The Final Report on Thick
Whois<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/thick-final-21oct13-en.pdf> has
been prepared as required by the GNSO PDP in the ICANN Bylaws. The Final Report
is based on the Initial Report of 21 June 2013 and has been updated to reflect
the review and analysis of the Public Comments received by the Thick Whois
Working Group, in addition to further deliberations. The report is submitted to
the GNSO Council for its consideration. The conclusions and recommendations for
next steps on the issues included in this PDP are outlined in Section 7 of the
report.
5.1 - Review
motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013>
2
5.2 - Discussion
5.3 - Next steps
Item 6: MOTION - To approve a charter for the Standing Committee on GNSO
Improvements Implementation (SCI) (10 mins)
The GNSO Council approved the original charter for the Standing Committee on
GNSO Improvements Implementation (SCI) in 2011. Recently, the SCI determined
that the Charter no longer reflected its current role as a standing committee,
and furthermore did not contain procedures for selecting its Chair and
Vice-Chair. The SCI requested guidance from the GNSO Council as to how to
proceed with revisions to the Charter and at its meeting on 05 September 2013
the GNSO Council endorsed the SCI as a standing committee and further requested
that the SCI proceed to revise the Charter as it may deem necessary, with the
exception of the section on Decision Making. The SCI has since revised the
Charter to reflect its role as a standing committee and to include procedures
to select the Chair and Vice Chair.
6.1 - Review
motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013>
3
6.2 - Discussion
6.3 - Next steps
Item 7: MOTION - A charter for the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation PDP
WG (10 mins)
ICANN staff prepared a
paper<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/negotiations-conclusion-16sep13-en.pdf>
to summarise the outcomes of the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA)
negotiations in order to set the scene for subsequent associated policy
development work to be managed by the Council. This is an ICANN Board
initiated PDP. The staff paper contained a draft charter for the PDP WG and
the Council has discussed this. Refinements to the charter have been proposed
as has a title for the PDP WG. Here the Council needs to decide to move ahead
with the revised draft charter prepared by staff or to institute a drafting
team to revise and / or develop the PDP WG charter.
7.1
Motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+31+October+2013>
4
7.2 Discussion
7.2 Next steps
Item 8: INPUT & DISCUSSION - Prospective improvements to the Policy Development
Process (10 mins)
The Council is committed to on-going enhancements to the methods of working of
the Council and the work initiated and managed by the Council. The PDP process
is a cornerstone of policy making within the GNSO and, as such, the work of the
Council. The PDP outcomes and associated processes are the subject of focus
and attention both within the GNSO and the broader ICANN Community. The Council
has previously discussed a paper prepared by ICANN
staff<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/pdp-improvements-22aug13-en.pdf> on
potential improvements to the PDP process. The discussion is now encapsulated
in a table form and further work needs to be done on reviewing the table and
agreeing concrete next steps.
8.1 - Review of table of prospective PDP
Improvements<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/pdp-improvements-table-23sep13-en.pdf>
(Marika Konings)
8.2 - Discussion
8.3 - Next steps
Item 9: DISCUSSION - Policy issues surrounding string confusion (10 mins)
The Council previously discussed issues associated with the string confusion
decisions that have been taken e.g. relating to plural and singular versions of
the same term and the apparently contradictory decisions on identical strings.
The Council agreed to write to the ICANN board and new gTLD programme
committee<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/robinson-to-crocker-chalaby-18sep13-en.pdf>
and to consider appropriate additional action. Further, the Council
subsequently (10 October 2013) agreed that additional action will be contingent
on receiving advice from ICANN legal counsel as to whether or not any
additional GNSO work on the topic will have the potential to be used in a
timely and effective manner within the new gTLD programme. Here the Council
needs to hear if any such advice, requested via ICANN policy staff, has been
forthcoming and, if so, what further action to take.
9.1 - Update on advice received
9.2 - Discussion
9.2 - Next steps
Item 10: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Protection of IGO-INGO Identifiers in all gTLDs
Policy Development Process (10 mins)
The WG Chair will provide an update on status of WG deliberations and the
public
comment<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/igo-ingo-final-20sep13-en.htm>
solicitation process for the draft Final
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-20sep13-en.pdf>. This
PDP WG was formed to develop a set of policy recommendations to address the
issue of whether and if so, what types of protections should be provided for
the identifiers of certain IGOs and INGOs including the RCRC and IOC at the top
and second levels in all gTLDs. For further information please see:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/igo-ingo.
10.1 - Review of proposed WG recommendations (Thomas Rickert)
10.2 - Discussion
10.3 - Next steps
Item 11: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Planning for Buenos Aires (10 mins)
Making the most out of the face-to-face meeting time available at the ICANN
Meeting in Buenos Aires will take planning. GNSO Council Vice Chair,
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben has again volunteered to lead this and will be working with
the Council and staff on this effort.
Here the Council has the opportunity to feed into plans and provide input based
on past experience. Included in this item will be the opportunity to shape the
approach to and substance of the Council's proposed meetings with other groups
in such as the CCNSO, the GAC and the ICANN board.
11.1 - Update (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
11.2 - Discussion
11.3 - Next steps
Item 12: Any Other Business (5 mins)
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO
Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or
other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting
thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in
Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative
vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3)
of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved
under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter
through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO
Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting
Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of
the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority
vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the
ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the
GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority
of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures
4.4<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf>)
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced
time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In
exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may
reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided
such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes
according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by
telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become
available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a
quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local time between October and March, Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 11:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA
(PDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>)
UTC-7+1DST 04:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-4+1DST 07:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+1DST 09:00
Montevideo, Uruguay
(UYST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/uyst.html>)
UTC-3+1DST 09:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 11:00
Abuja, Nigeria
(WAT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/africa/wat.html>)
UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Bonn, Germany (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Stockholm, Sweden (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+2+0DST 13:00
Ramat Hasharon,
Israel(IST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/ist-israel.html>)
UTC+2+0DST 13:00
Karachi, Pakistan
(PKT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/pkt.html>
) UTC+5+0DST 16:00
Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 19:00
Perth, Australia
(WST<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html>)
UTC+8+0DST 19:00
Wellington, New Zealand
(NZDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/pacific/nzdt.html>
) UTC+12+1DST 00:00 (next day)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DST starts/ends on last Sunday of March 2014, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with
exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com - http://tinyurl
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|