Re: [council] Draft PDP charter - Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation PDP WG
Dear all, attached is a revised version of the draft charter, to which I've added Volker's suggested questions (below) to the scope of the WG's work and fixed the previous typos. I hope this revised version will be of assistance in your continuing discussions. Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx * One World. One Internet. * From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Organization: Afilias Reply-To: "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:07 AM To: 'Volker Greimann' <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [council] Draft PDP charter - Privacy & Proxy Accreditation Services PDP WG > Thanks Volker, > > Agreed on the title. I think the Privacy & Proxy Accreditation Services PDP > WG is a typo/error and it should read Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation > PDP WG. > Thanks also for the specific additional input of your two points italicised > below. > > I¹d very much like to get additional input on whether or not we (or with the > help of input from our respective groups / constituencies) can get the current > draft charter polished to a satisfactory state. > > There is obviously a driver to getting the WG going without the DT step i.e. > to demonstrate that the PDP process can be efficient and, to some extent, > flexible whilst still being thorough. > But, clearly we need to be sure that we are confident that we can tolerate > skipping this (DT) step if we go down that route. > > Jonathan > > > From: Volker Greimann [mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 15 October 2013 18:15 > To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [council] Draft PDP charter - Privacy & Proxy Accreditation > Services PDP WG > > > Hi Jonathan, > > first of all, I support the new naming of the proposed PDP to better fit and > describe the only identified remaining issues. By giving the PDP WG a name > that says what is does, it will be easier to attract the necessary parties to > participate in this important effort and add focus the work effort. Maybe just > one suggestion would be to switch the positions of the words "Accreditation" > and "Services" to make it read: "Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation PDP > WG", i.e. the way it is spelled out in text of the draft charter, but not in > the headline. > > Regarding the charter, I feel that the draft is already a good template for > the WG. While it may be advisable to give it a final polish in a Drafting > Team, I can see why there is support for option one. I would however suggest a > few further issues to consider: > > "What are the effects of the privacy & proxy service specification contained > in the 2013 RAA? Have these new requirements improved Whois quality, > registrant contactability and service usability?" > > "What should be the contractual obligations of ICANN accredited registrars > with regard to accredited privacy/proxy service providers? Should registrars > be permitted to knowingly accept registrations where the registrant is using > unaccredited service providers that are however bound to the same standards as > accredited service providers?" > > etc. > > So I am not yet certain this draft is or should be the final word. While the > remaining changes to this draft may be minor, it maybe worthwhile to go > through the entire process by creating a drafting team, if just to make sure > all the "i"s are dotted. > > Best regards, > > Volker >> All, >> >> >> >> Following up on our discussion regarding the charter for the ³RAA Remaining >> Issues PDP² on our call on Thursday last week, I hope that we can start a >> discussion right away regarding possible revisions to the draft charter >> prepared by staff which I forwarded to you all just prior to our meeting. I >> believe our aim should be to form a view as to whether or not the draft >> charter, as amended according to our anticipated discussions, is a document >> that can be voted on for adoption at our next Council meeting. >> >> As a reminder, our options are essentially either: >> >> 1. Discuss and revise this draft charter for formal adoption by the >> Council, which will then proceed to form a Working Group (WG) to begin work; >> or >> >> 2. Create a Drafting Team (DT) to finalize a charter based either upon >> this draft or starting from a blank slate to be proposed for adoption at a >> later Council meeting. >> >> >> >> On our Thursday call last week, several Councillors supported option 1 above >> as a pragmatic way forward i.e. to see if we can find agreement as to the >> terms of the charter that will govern the WG's work. I am therefore >> circulating the draft Charter again (re-titled and slightly revised to more >> accurately reflect the scope of the PDP) for discussion. >> >> My sense is that the scope will be largely governed by the specific issues >> that are laid out in Section III of the draft Charter. So, perhaps we can >> start by discussing possible revisions to these questions, not in terms of >> substantive discussion over the merits or content of the answers, but in >> relation to whether they sufficiently describe and frame the scope of work >> for the WG. >> >> >> >> If we are able to reach agreement within the next week, we can then propose >> the revised charter for adoption on 21 October i.e. within the document >> deadline for our upcoming 31 October meeting. >> >> >> >> I look forward to an engaging and constructive discussion on the list on this >> topic. >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Jonathan > > > > -- > Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung. > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > > Volker A. Greimann > - Rechtsabteilung - > > Key-Systems GmbH > Im Oberen Werk 1 > 66386 St. Ingbert > Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 > Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 > Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Web: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net> / www.RRPproxy.net > <http://www.RRPproxy.net> > www.domaindiscount24.com <http://www.domaindiscount24.com> / > www.BrandShelter.com <http://www.BrandShelter.com> > > Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook: > www.facebook.com/KeySystems <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems> > www.twitter.com/key_systems <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems> > > Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin > Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken > Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534 > > Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP > www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu> > > Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen > Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder > Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese > Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per > E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen. > > -------------------------------------------- > > Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. > > Best regards, > > Volker A. Greimann > - legal department - > > Key-Systems GmbH > Im Oberen Werk 1 > 66386 St. Ingbert > Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 > Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 > Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Web: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net> / www.RRPproxy.net > <http://www.RRPproxy.net> > www.domaindiscount24.com <http://www.domaindiscount24.com> / > www.BrandShelter.com <http://www.BrandShelter.com> > > Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated: > www.facebook.com/KeySystems <http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems> > www.twitter.com/key_systems <http://www.twitter.com/key_systems> > > CEO: Alexander Siffrin > Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken > V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534 > > Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP > www.keydrive.lu <http://www.keydrive.lu> > > This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is > addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this > email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an > addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify > the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone. > > > Attachment:
17 Oct Revised Draft RAA Charter.doc Attachment:
smime.p7s
|