<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: Ballot on Motion on the Adoption of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings Policy Development Process Final Report and Recommendations
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Re: Ballot on Motion on the Adoption of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings Policy Development Process Final Report and Recommendations
- From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:18:05 -0400
- Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <C4B5E5D7461AB54B875986D2919CBB5FF826953D99@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <C4B5E5D7461AB54B875986D2919CBB5FF826953D99@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
On 08/01/2013 12:26 PM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
>
>
> Dear Wendy,
>
> Pursuant to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures section 4.4 Absentee Voting
> Procedures
> GNSO Council Operating Procedures approved 13 September 2012 for the GNSO
> Council and updated.
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13jun13-en.pdf>
> absentee voting is allowed on the motion on the Adoption of the Locking of a
> Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings Policy Development Process Final
> Report and Recommendations.
>
> Your absentee ballot follows. Please indicate your preference with an X and
> send the lines preceded with *asterisks directly to the GNSO Council Mailing
> list.
>
>
>
> * On the motion I vote:
>
> * [ X ] Yes
>
> * [ ] No
>
> * [ ] Abstain
>
> * Password: Green-5
Note that I vote in favor only because Recommendation 4's "reveal" of
registrants behind privacy or proxy services is a "may." I expect that
we will gather data for future evaluation of how often these procedures
are used as denial-of-service attacks or identification attacks against
legitimate domain registrants.
Thank you,
--Wendy
>
>
>
> This process should be completed within 72 hours of the meeting which ended
> at 15:20 UTC on Thursday, 1 August 2013.
> (The completed ballot is due NLT 15:20 UTC, Sunday, 4 August 2011)
>
> Motion on the Adoption of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP
> Proceedings Policy Development Process Final Report and Recommendations
>
> Made by: Jeff Neumann
> Seconded by: Brian Winterfeldt
>
> WHEREAS
>
> 1. On 15 December 2011, the GNSO Council launched a Policy Development
> Process (PDP) on the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings to
> make recommendations to the GNSO Council to address the issues identified
> with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings.
>
>
>
> 2. This PDP has followed the prescribed PDP steps as stated in the Bylaws,
> resulting in a Final Report delivered on 5 July 2013;
>
> 3. The Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings WG has reached
> full consensus on the recommendations in relation to addressing the issues
> identified with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings;
>
> 4. The GNSO Council has reviewed and discussed these recommendations.
>
> Now therefore be it resolved,
>
> 1. The GNSO Council recommends to the ICANN Board of Directors the adoption
> of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings recommendations
> as detailed in the Final Report
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-final-05jul13-en.pdf
>
> 2. The GNSO Council shall convene a Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP
> Proceedings Implementation Review Team to assist ICANN Staff in developing
> the implementation details for the new policy should it be approved by the
> ICANN Board. The Implementation Review Team will be tasked with evaluating
> the proposed implementation of the policy recommendations as approved by the
> Board and is expected to work with ICANN Staff to ensure that the resultant
> implementation fulfills the intentions of the approved policy
> recommendations. If the Implementation Review Team identifies any potential
> modifications to the policy recommendations or need for new policy
> recommendations, the Implementation Review Team shall refer these to the GNSO
> Council for its consideration and follow-up, as appropriate. Following
> adoption by the ICANN Board of the recommendations, the GNSO Secretariat is
> authorized to issue a call for volunteers for a Locking of a Domain Name
> subject to UDRP Proceedings !
Implementa
tion Review Team to the members of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP
Proceedings Working Group.
>
> In case of any connectivity issues, please feel free to contact me on my cell
> phone.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Glen
>
>
>
> Glen de Saint Géry
>
> GNSO Secretariat
>
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
> Cell + 33 6 21 79 24 54
>
> glen@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613
Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
http://wendy.seltzer.org/
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|