ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Re: Ballot on Motion on the Adoption of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings Policy Development Process Final Report and Recommendations

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Re: Ballot on Motion on the Adoption of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings Policy Development Process Final Report and Recommendations
  • From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:18:05 -0400
  • Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <C4B5E5D7461AB54B875986D2919CBB5FF826953D99@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <C4B5E5D7461AB54B875986D2919CBB5FF826953D99@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6

On 08/01/2013 12:26 PM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear Wendy,
> 
> Pursuant to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures section 4.4 Absentee Voting 
> Procedures
> GNSO Council Operating Procedures approved 13 September 2012 for the GNSO 
> Council and updated.
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13jun13-en.pdf>
> absentee voting is allowed on the motion on the Adoption of the Locking of a 
> Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings Policy Development Process Final 
> Report and Recommendations.
> 
> Your absentee ballot follows.  Please indicate your preference with an X and 
> send the lines preceded with *asterisks directly to the GNSO Council Mailing 
> list.
> 
> 
> 
> * On the motion I vote:
> 
> * [ X ] Yes
> 
> * [ ] No
> 
> * [ ] Abstain
> 
> * Password: Green-5

Note that I vote in favor only because Recommendation 4's "reveal" of
registrants behind privacy or proxy services is a "may." I expect that
we will gather data for future evaluation of how often these procedures
are used as denial-of-service attacks or identification attacks against
legitimate domain registrants.

Thank you,
--Wendy


> 
> 
> 
> This process should be completed within 72 hours of the meeting which ended 
> at 15:20 UTC on Thursday, 1 August 2013.
> (The completed ballot is due NLT 15:20 UTC, Sunday, 4 August  2011)
> 
> Motion on the Adoption of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP 
> Proceedings Policy Development Process Final Report and Recommendations
> 
> Made by: Jeff Neumann
> Seconded by: Brian Winterfeldt
> 
> WHEREAS
> 
>  1. On 15 December 2011, the GNSO Council launched a Policy Development 
> Process (PDP) on the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings to 
> make recommendations to the GNSO Council to address the issues identified 
> with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings.
> 
> 
> 
> 2. This PDP has followed the prescribed PDP steps as stated in the Bylaws, 
> resulting in a Final Report delivered on 5 July 2013;
> 
> 3. The Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings WG has reached 
> full consensus on the recommendations in relation to addressing the issues 
> identified with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings;
> 
> 4. The GNSO Council has reviewed and discussed these recommendations.
> 
> Now therefore be it resolved,
> 
>  1. The GNSO Council recommends to the ICANN Board of Directors the adoption 
> of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings recommendations 
> as detailed in the Final Report 
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-final-05jul13-en.pdf
> 
>  2. The GNSO Council shall convene a Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP 
> Proceedings Implementation Review Team to assist ICANN Staff in developing 
> the implementation details for the new policy should it be approved by the 
> ICANN Board. The Implementation Review Team will be tasked with evaluating 
> the proposed implementation of the policy recommendations as approved by the 
> Board and is expected to work with ICANN Staff to ensure that the resultant 
> implementation fulfills the intentions of the approved policy 
> recommendations. If the Implementation Review Team identifies any potential 
> modifications to the policy recommendations or need for new policy 
> recommendations, the Implementation Review Team shall refer these to the GNSO 
> Council for its consideration and follow-up, as appropriate. Following 
> adoption by the ICANN Board of the recommendations, the GNSO Secretariat is 
> authorized to issue a call for volunteers for a Locking of a Domain Name 
> subject to UDRP Proceedings !
 Implementa
tion Review Team to the members of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP 
Proceedings Working Group.
> 
> In case of any connectivity issues, please feel free to contact me on my cell 
> phone.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Glen
> 
> 
> 
> Glen de Saint Géry
> 
> GNSO Secretariat
> 
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> Cell + 33 6 21 79 24 54
> 
> glen@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613
Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
http://wendy.seltzer.org/
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>