<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Request for Comments: Initial Report on Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Request for Comments: Initial Report on Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:41:21 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac5qsE5yabyWxJK0S6mFtHhmLZrdag==
- Thread-topic: Request for Comments: Initial Report on Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/igo-ingo-initial-14jun13-en.htm
Initial Report on Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs
Comment / Reply Periods (*)
Comment Open Date: 14 June 2013
Comment Close Date: 17 July 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Reply Open Date: 18 July 2013
Reply Close Date: 7 August 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Important Information Links
Public Comment
Announcement<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-14jun13-en.htm>
To Submit Your Comments
(Forum)<mailto:comments-igo-ingo-initial-14jun13@xxxxxxxxx>
View Comments
Submitted<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-igo-ingo-initial-14jun13/>
Brief Overview
Originating Organization:
GNSO
Categories/Tags:
* Policy Processes
Purpose (Brief):
The Generic Names Supporting Organization ("GNSO") Policy Development Process
Working Group tasked with addressing the issue of Protecting the identifiers of
certain International Government Organizations ("IGOs") and International
Non-Governmental Organizations ("INGOs") in all gTLDs has published its Initial
Report for public comment.
Current Status:
The GNSO Policy Development Process Working Group ("PDP WG") on the Protection
of IGO and INGO Identifiers in all gTLDs has published this Initial Report and
is soliciting community input on the proposed policy recommendation options
currently under consideration by the PDP WG. This Initial Report has also been
submitted to the GNSO Council on 14 June 2013.
Next Steps:
Following the review of and taking into account the public comments received
during this Public Forum, the PDP WG will continue its deliberations on the
proposed policy recommendation options in view of reaching consensus on a set
of policy recommendations, which if reached, will be included in a draft Final
Report. The draft Final Report with the final policy recommendations will be
published for public comment. The PDP WG will take into account any input
received and submit a Final Report to the GNSO Council for further action.
Staff Contact:
Brian Peck
Email Staff
Contact<mailto:policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx?subject=More%20information%20on%20the%20Initial%20Report%20on%20Protection%20of%20IGO%20and%20INGO%20Identifiers%20in%20All%20gTLDs%20public%20comment%20period>
Detailed Information
Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose:
In its Initial Report the PDP WG provides background information on the issues
related to the protection for certain IGO and INGO (including the Red Cross Red
Crescent Movement ("RCRC") and International Olympic Committee ("IOC"))
identifiers. The report also includes a summary of the Working Group's
deliberations with respect to the issues defined in the WG's Charter.
Most importantly, sections 4.3 through 4.7 of this Initial Report present a
list of proposed policy recommendation options currently being considered by
the PDP WG, for the protection of certain IGO and INGO identifiers in all
gTLDs. The proposed policy recommendation options for the protection of certain
IGO and INGO identifiers presented in this Report (including the option to
provide no special protections) are delineated between top and second level
domains.
The proposed policy recommendation options for the protection of the
organization's identifiers in all gTLDs presented in this report do not
represent a consensus position by the Working Group members; but rather, are
options which the Working Group is considering. The objective of this Initial
Report is to present the proposed policy recommendation options currently under
consideration to solicit feedback from the community on these recommendations.
Specifically, the Working Group would welcome comments from community members
on the following questions:
1. Which recommendation option(s) for the protection of certain IGO and INGO
(including RCRC and IOC) identifiers at the top and/or second levels as listed
in Sections 4.3 to 4.7 would you support? Please provide a rationale.
2. If you do not support any of the recommendation options, please suggest
any reasonable alternatives as delineated between top and second-level
protections you may have. Please also provide a rationale.
Section II: Background:
For a detailed background and history of the issue on whether to protect
certain IGO and INGO identifiers including the RCRC and IOC prior to the
initiation of this PDP, please see the Final GNSO Issue Report on the
Protection of International Organization Names in New
gTLDs<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/protection-igo-names-final-issue-report-01oct12-en.pdf>
[PDF, 675 KB]. The Issue Report was initiated as a result of a recommendation
by the GNSO Drafting Team formed to provide a GNSO Council response to the
Board and GAC on the protection of IOC and RCRC names in new gTLDs. After
community review, the scope of the Final GNSO Issue Report included an
evaluation of whether to protect the names of both international government and
non-government organizations at the top level and second level in all gTLDs.
At its October meeting last year, the GNSO Council considered the Final GNSO
Issue Report on the Protection of International Organization Names in New
gTLDs, and approved a motion to initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP")
for the protection of certain international organization names and acronyms in
all gTLDs. The Working Group ("WG") was formed on 31 October 2012 and the WG
Charter was approved by the GNSO Council on 15 November 2012. The decision was
taken in this context to subsume the issues of the IOC and Red Cross Red
Crescent designations and names under the new PDP WG process.
As part of its deliberations, the PDP WG was required under the WG Charter to
consider the following questions:
1. Whether there is a need for special protections at the top and second
level in all existing and new gTLDs for the names and acronyms of the following
types of international organizations: International Governmental Organizations
(IGOs) protected by international law and multiple domestic statutes,
International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) receiving protections
under treaties and statutes under multiple jurisdictions, specifically
including the Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement (RCRC), and the International
Olympic Committee (IOC). In deliberating this issue, the WG should consider the
following elements:
* Quantifying the Entities to be Considered for Special Protection
* Evaluating the Scope of Existing Protections under International
Treaties/National Laws for IGO, RCRC and IOC Names
* Establishing Qualification Criteria for Special Protection of
International Organization Names
* Distinguishing Any Substantive Differences Between the RCRC and IOC
From Other International Organizations
2. If there is a need for special protections at the top and second level in
all existing and new gTLDs for certain international organization names and
acronyms, the PDP WG is expected to develop policy recommendations for such
protections. Specifically, the PDP WG should:
* Determine whether the current special protections being provided to
RCRC and IOC names at the top and second level of the initial round of new
gTLDs should be made permanent for RCRC and IOC names in all gTLDs and if not,
develop specific recommendations for the appropriate special protections for
these names.
* Develop specific recommendations for appropriate special protections
for the names and acronyms of all other qualifying international organizations.
Section III: Document and Resource Links:
Initial Report on Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All
gTLDs<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-initial-14jun13-en.pdf> [PDF,
609 KB]
Section IV: Additional Information:
* Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs
Page<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/igo-ingo>
* Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs
Wiki<http://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/>
* Protection of International Olympic Committee / Red Cross Names
Page<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/ioc-rcrc>
________________________________
(*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not guaranteed to
be considered in any final summary, analysis, reporting, or decision-making
that takes place once this period lapses.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|