<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Letter to the EWG
- To: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Letter to the EWG
- From: Mason Cole <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:14:09 -0700
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <025201ce6784$bc99e7b0$35cdb710$@afilias.info>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <025201ce6784$bc99e7b0$35cdb710$@afilias.info>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I support.
On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> All,
>
> Please see attached and included the draft of my letter to the EWG. I think
> it is timely and important to get this letter done now.
> It does reflect that changes have taken place since Beijing but the principal
> point (and point of principle) remains regarding the risk of GNSO policy work
> taking place outside of the purview of the Council
>
> I have not been able to locate John Berard’s original suggestion for some
> reason and, in any event, would appreciate rapid support of this text or
> suggested improvements.
> I can fix minor grammar. Really what I am after is support that I have
> effectively captured and communicated the essence of our concerns.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> 12 June 2013
>
> Mr Jean-Francois Baril, Advisor to the President & CEO, ICANN
> Mr. Fadi Chehade, President & CEO, ICANN
>
> Dear Jean-Francois,
>
> I am writing to you in your capacity as Chair and or Lead Facilitator of the
> Expert Working Group (EWG) on Directory Services and as requested of me by
> the GNSO Council. Specifically, the Council has raised and discussed the
> relationship of the work of the EWG to any related policy work within the
> GNSO, as directed and managed by the GNSO Council.
>
> When the Council met in Beijing, consideration was given to a staff
> recommendation to delay the work of a Policy Development Process (PDP)
> pending the outcome of the EWG. This recommendation has subsequently changed
> and it is likely that the PDP work (on Transliteration and Translation of
> Contact Information) will now go ahead in parallel with that of the EWG.
> Nevertheless, the concern remains that the potentially substantive work being
> undertaken (by the EWG) is outside of the purview of the Council and yet may
> have a significant impact on GNSO participants.
>
> Therefore, the specific point is that I am seeking to make on behalf of the
> Council is to ascertain your intention and ensure your commitment that the
> work of the EWG will ultimately be referred back to the GNSO for input and
> ultimately integration into established PDP processes.
>
> Whilst the primary objective of writing to you is to clarify the role of the
> EWG in relation to the GNSO’s policy work, it will also be very helpful to
> understand your latest perspectives on the milestones and timing of the work
> of the EWG.
>
> Yours Sincerely,
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan Robinson
> Chair, GNSO Council
>
> <EWG on Directory Services - GNSO Council Chair to Jean-Francois Baril -
> Draft - 12 June 2013.docx>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|