<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Revised Registry Agreement Posted for Review
- To: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Revised Registry Agreement Posted for Review
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 05:34:10 -0400
- In-reply-to: <004401ce3114$b6e60d40$24b227c0$@ipracon.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <d3152c38-ff86-418b-a39c-df97be107406@EXHUB2010-3.campus.MCGILL.CA> <004401ce3114$b6e60d40$24b227c0$@ipracon.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No problem, but since te changes, particularly with respect to the
Board's right to unilaterally amend, it looked like it needed quick
distribution.
Alan
At 04/04/2013 05:13 AM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Thanks Alan,
I know Glen has had some email issues due to new hardware so that may
explain.
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: 04 April 2013 04:58
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Revised Registry Agreement Posted for Review
Perhaps I missed it, but do not recall seeing this posted to this list.
http://blog.icann.org/2013/04/revised-registry-agreement-posted-for-review/
Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|