ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] GAC draft gTLD agenda for Beijing

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] GAC draft gTLD agenda for Beijing
  • From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:47:02 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac4vQzCagebbAuUuT2iHKim0kL0eQQ==
  • Thread-topic: GAC draft gTLD agenda for Beijing


GAC draft gTLD agenda for Beijing and advice to the ICANN Board on 
controversial or sensitive strings and applications

https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Governmental+Advisory+Committee


31 March 2013 
 
GAC draft gTLD agenda for Beijing and advice to the ICANN Board on 
controversial or sensitive strings and applications

As the New gTLD Program moves forward, the GAC is making preparations for 
delivering further advice on new gTLDs.  This advice constitutes a key element 
of the overall process as outlined in the Applicant Guidebook (AG).

As anticipated, GAC Member Early Warnings were issued on November 20, 2012, and 
applicants and GAC Members have been exchanging information with the aim of 
reaching an understanding or agreement on concerns raised, wherever possible.

In terms of the next phase, described in module 3.1 of the AG, the GAC as a 
whole will be discussing its advice on new gTLDs.  These sessions are organized 
into two parts:


***  Part I   Safeguard advice on the basis of categories of strings ***

The GAC discussions will proceed on the basis of advice to safeguard categories 
of strings that raise concerns, or potential concerns, for governments.  There 
are currently nine draft categories of strings proposed for the GAC's Beijing 
agenda.  Six were identified in the GAC Toronto Communique:

   Consumer protection

   Strings that are linked to regulated market sectors, such as the financial, 
health and charity sectors

   Competition issues

   Strings that have broad or multiple uses or meanings, and where one entity 
is seeking exclusive use

   Religious terms where the applicant has no, or limited, support from the 
relevant religious organisations or the religious community.

   Minimising the need for defensive registrations

   Protection of geographic names

   Intellectual property rights particularly in relation to strings aimed at 
the distribution of music, video and other digital material


Three additional categories have now been proposed for consideration:

   Support for applications submitted by global authorities

   Corporate Identifier gTLDs

   Strings that represent inherent government functions and/or activities

As the GAC looks at these nine categories, and how they would apply to strings 
and applications falling under these categories, the number of safeguard 
categories or titles of the categories could change.


**  Part II  GAC advice/objections on specific applications  **  

Twenty specific applications have been brought forward by a GAC Member or 
Members for consideration by the GAC.  The GAC Member(s) putting forward these 
applications have linked them to the following categories:

        Community name where the applicant does not have support from the 
community or the government: 1

        Consumer protection: 2

        Name of an Intergovernmental Organisation (IGO): 1

        Protection of geographic names: 9

        Religious terms: 2

        Strings applied for that represent inherent government functions and/or 
activities: 3

        Support for applications submitted by global authorities: 2

The Operating Principles of the GAC outline the consensus-based approach of the 
Committee and will serve as a key reference for the GAC in its deliberations.

The GAC looks forward to the upcoming meetings and holding exchanges with the 
ICANN Board and community on these and other important matters.









<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>