<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Agenda for GNSO Council Meetings in Beijing / Council-Board
- To: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Agenda for GNSO Council Meetings in Beijing / Council-Board
- From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:58:01 -0400
- Cc: "'Neuman, Jeff'" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <064501ce24d5$72a1e690$57e5b3b0$@ipracon.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <061a01ce24d2$4ed88d70$ec89a850$@ipracon.com> <1C4C1D63EA1A814AA391AEFD88199A3E0104387D6F@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com> <064501ce24d5$72a1e690$57e5b3b0$@ipracon.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4
Thanks Jonathan and Jeff,
For our meeting with the Board, NCSG agrees that multistakholder
engagement should be top of the agenda (we noted the issue as Bottom-up
multi-stakeholderism versus ICANN unilateralism).
In addition, we'd suggest consideration of Definition of the "public
interest" at ICANN; ICANN engagement & outreach plans; and possibly
New constituencies.
Best,
-Wendy
On 03/19/2013 03:10 PM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> Thanks Jeff. I agree and think it may even be necessary to go back to first
> principles on the function and role of the GNSO Council within the GNSO and
> in the context of the overall multi-stakeholder model.
>
>
>
> From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 19 March 2013 19:01
> To: Jonathan Robinson; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Agenda for GNSO Council Meetings in Beijing
>
>
>
> With the Board, I think it is imperative that we talk about our views on the
> multi-stakeholder process and the recent measures we have seen that we
> believe erode away at that model.
>
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>
>
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:48 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Agenda for GNSO Council Meetings in Beijing
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> We are on track with a team to work with peers in the ccNSO in order to
> develop the proposed topics for our meeting with the ccNSO.
>
>
>
> As far as our prospective meeting with the GAC Is concerned, that is still
> work in progress, so for now that leaves meeting with the ICANN Board and
> the CEO.
>
>
>
> Typically in the past, these meetings have consisted of our topics / their
> topics and my sense is that we have, at least at times, talked past one
> another.
>
> However, it is clearly still very useful to have a view on key areas we like
> to see covered in our interaction with the CEO and the board and to do the
> preparatory work on these.
>
>
>
> With the above in mind, I'd welcome input that proposes topics for either or
> both of these interactions.
>
> Once we settle on the topics (I have contacted both the board and the CEO in
> order to collaborate on these) we'll likely need volunteers to develop the
> topics and potentially lead the discussions.
>
>
>
> Therefore, please can you propose one or more topics for either or both
> sessions (with CEO and Board) as soon as possible.
>
>
>
> Thank-you.
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613
Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
http://wendy.seltzer.org/
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|