ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Request to GNSO on "closed generic" strings.

  • To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Request to GNSO on "closed generic" strings.
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:51:42 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <263EE96C7DADD44CB3D5A07DBD41D0E83DFA6A3B@bne3-0002mitmbx.c orp.mit>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <263EE96C7DADD44CB3D5A07DBD41D0E83DFA6A3B@bne3-0002mitmbx.corp.mit>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Note the March 7 close of this comment period (and apparently no reply period) when GNSO input is requested. Alan

At 05/02/2013 09:17 PM, Bruce Tonkin wrote:

PS, I somehow missed some text below:

Resolved (2013.02.02.NG02), the New gTLD Program Committee directs the President and CEO to, concurrently with the opening of the public comment forum, request the GNSO to provide guidance on the issue of "closed generic" TLDs if the GNSO wishes to provide such guidance. Guidance on this issue is requested to be provided by the close of the public comment forum.

Bruce Tonkin

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>