<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Call for Volunteers: Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members - Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Call for Volunteers: Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members - Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:25:09 -0800
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac37Ux6CcFxNfcE9QYaRX4sr6Hgv/Q==
- Thread-topic: Call for Volunteers: Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members - Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D
http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-25jan13-en.htm
Call for Volunteers: Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group Members -
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D
In Brief
The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks volunteers to
serve on a Working Group that will address issues related to the transfer of
domain names between registrars. After investigating and considering specific
issues (detailed below), the Working Group is expected to recommend how to
handle these issues, which could include proposals for changes to the existing
Inter-Registrar Transfer
Policy<http://archive.icann.org/en/transfers/policy-12jul04.htm> (a consensus
policy adopted in 2004).
What This Group Will Do
The initial tasks of the group will be to consider the following six
questions[1] and make relevant recommendations to the GNSO Council:
a) Whether reporting requirements for registries and dispute providers
should be
developed, in order to make precedent and trend information
available to the
community and allow reference to past cases in dispute
submissions;
b) Whether additional provisions should be included in the TDRP (Transfer
Dispute Resolution Policy) on how to handle disputes when multiple transfers
have
occurred;
c) Whether dispute options for registrants should be developed and
implemented as
part of the policy (registrants currently depend on registrars
to initiate a dispute on
their behalf);
d) Whether requirements or best practices should be put into place for
registrars to make information on transfer dispute resolution options available
to registrants;
e) Whether existing penalties for policy violations are sufficient or if
additional provisions/penalties for specific violations should be added into
the policy;
f) Whether the universal adoption and implementation of EPP AuthInfo
codes has eliminated the need of FOAs.
How This Group Will Work
ICANN Working Groups use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this WG
will be recorded, and the recordings will be available to the public. The
mailing list for the IRTP Part D WG will be archived publicly. Working Group
members are expected to submit Statements of Interest (SOI). The group will
collaborate using a public workspace. The Working Group is expected to follow
the GNSO Working Group
Guidelines<../../Library/Caches/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/Outlook%20Temp/gnso.icann.org/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-07apr11-en.pdf>.
How to Join
The Council invites interested parties to provide names of expected
participants who can then be added to the WG mailing list. The GNSO Council may
also invite stakeholders and experts to join. Participants in the Working Group
that addressed IRTP Part C are especially encouraged to apply. Community
members who wish to be invited to join the group should contact the GNSO
secretariat<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxx?subject=Application%20to%20Join%20IRTP%20Part%20C%20Working%20Group>
(gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxx). This WG is already forming; please apply
promptly.
Background
The Inter‐Registrar Transfer
Policy<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/transfers/policy-01jun12.htm>
(IRTP) is a consensus policy adopted in 2004 to provide a straightforward
procedure for domain name holders to transfer domain names between registrars.
An overall review of this policy identified areas that require clarification or
improvement. At its meeting on 17 January 2013, the Generic Names Supporting
Organization (GNSO) Council passed a resolution chartering a Policy Development
Process (PDP) Working Group (WG) to address the topic of Inter-Registrar
Transfer Policies (IRTP) Part D. Because the initial review identified a wide
range of issues related to transferring domain names, the issues have been
categorized into subsets. This Working Group will tackle the issues referred to
as “Part D”.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
________________________________
[1] See the final Issue Report on the IRTP Part
D<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/issue-report-irtp-d-08jan13-en.pdf> for
further details on each of these issues.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|