<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Independent Objector's Comments on Controversal new gTLD applications
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Independent Objector's Comments on Controversal new gTLD applications
- From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 06:06:07 +0000
- Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac3snQZZ6NxJcMAsSbisrjChArFkUg==
- Thread-topic: Independent Objector's Comments on Controversal new gTLD applications
Hello All,
I note that the independent objector, Professor Alain Pellet, has released
some preliminary comments on controversial new gTLDs applications.
See:
http://www.independent-objector-newgtlds.org/english-version/the-independent-objector-s-comments-on-controversial-applications
The strings analysed so far are: .adult, .gay, .hot, .lgbt, .persiangulf,
.porn, .sex, .sexy, and .wtf.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|