ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [council] Some comments on the draft initial letter to the GAC

I agree.

There is also a typo in the last sentence of the letter: twice "we are".

Best regards

Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Winterfeldt, Brian
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012 21:40
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [council] Some comments on the draft initial letter to the GAC

Dear all:

I am fine with Jonathan's draft letter as well as John's proposed stylistic 

I think best intentions goes without saying and might suggest amending the 
final paragraph as follows. "In the meantime, please be assured of the GNSO 
Council's best intentions as well as our appreciation of the critical role 
played by the GAC within the ICANN multi-stakeholder model."  Also, the GAC may 
be unclear on what is meant by "the leadership team of the GNSO Council."  Why 
not just say, "we"?

I hope that input is helpful.

Best regards,


Brian J. Winterfeldt

+1 202 429 6260 direct
+1 202 903 4422 mobile
+1 202 429 3902 fax

Steptoe & Johnson LLP - DC
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036

+1 212.506.3935 direct
+1 212.506.3950 fax

Steptoe & Johnson LLP - New York
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm 
Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are 
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this 
information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message.

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on 
behalf of 
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:23:52 AM
To: Jonathan Robinson; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Some comments on the draft initial letter to the GAC
Auto forwarded by a Rule


It seems as if I may have too much time on my hands -- I have made some 
suggestions of tone (I think) to the draft you proposed.  Choose or ignore as 
you see fit.


John Berard
Credible Context
58 West Portal Avenue, #291
San Francisco, CA 94127
m: 415.845.4388

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>