AW: [council] Some comments on the draft initial letter to the GAC
There is also a typo in the last sentence of the letter: twice "we are".
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Winterfeldt, Brian
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012 21:40
Betreff: RE: [council] Some comments on the draft initial letter to the GAC
I am fine with Jonathan's draft letter as well as John's proposed stylistic
I think best intentions goes without saying and might suggest amending the
final paragraph as follows. "In the meantime, please be assured of the GNSO
Council's best intentions as well as our appreciation of the critical role
played by the GAC within the ICANN multi-stakeholder model." Also, the GAC may
be unclear on what is meant by "the leadership team of the GNSO Council." Why
not just say, "we"?
I hope that input is helpful.
Brian J. Winterfeldt
+1 202 429 6260 direct
+1 202 903 4422 mobile
+1 202 429 3902 fax
Steptoe & Johnson LLP - DC
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
+1 212.506.3935 direct
+1 212.506.3950 fax
Steptoe & Johnson LLP - New York
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm
Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this
information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:23:52 AM
To: Jonathan Robinson; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Some comments on the draft initial letter to the GAC
Auto forwarded by a Rule
It seems as if I may have too much time on my hands -- I have made some
suggestions of tone (I think) to the draft you proposed. Choose or ignore as
you see fit.
58 West Portal Avenue, #291
San Francisco, CA 94127