ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [council] RE: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart

  • To: <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: [council] RE: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:49:45 +0100
  • Accept-language: de-DE
  • Acceptlanguage: de-DE
  • In-reply-to: <00d301cdbc0c$9001f810$b005e830$@ipracon.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <560B87A6C4C20F4999D73431D61B4847011C7D67C6@SJUSEVS10.steptoe.com> <00d301cdbc0c$9001f810$b005e830$@ipracon.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQFfCp2VNT+G9mF8O0xYqdVgywupjZi5/CdAgACuGiA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] RE: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart

Jonathan and all,

you have my support to send this letter to the board. The matrix is the essence 
of what has lenghtilybeen discussed - and it's self-explaining. From my point 
of view there is no further need to negotiate wordings in the coverage letter.

Best regards

Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Jonathan Robinson
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. November 2012 11:51
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [council] RE: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart
Wichtigkeit: Hoch

Brian & Margie,

Thank-you both for the efforts to bring this to the point you have now got it 

Fellow Councillors, please note the following:

1.       We now have a summary of our respective positions as well as an 
appropriate covering letter

2.       The board is scheduled to meet to discuss this issue in approximately 
48 hours (8th November)

Therefore, I believe that we should send this letter to the board including an 
apology for the fact that it arrives immediately before their meeting.

My view is that sending our response late (as we will have to do) is better 
than not sending it all for two reasons:

A.      We have done a lot of work on this

B.      It does not reflect well on us as a Council to not send a response.

Please can I have your support (or opposition if you feel that) for sending 
this letter tomorrow.

In order to do so, I need your support (or not) by no later than 05h00 UTC on 
Wed 7th November.


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Winterfeldt, Brian
Sent: 05 November 2012 23:29
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] RE: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart

Dear all:

I would like to thank Margie for her hard work collecting data and assembling 
the attached chart on the recommendations from the WHOIS Review Team Final 
Report.  We owe an apology to the Board for taking longer on this endeavor than 
was originally anticipated.

Attached for the consideration and approval of the entire Council please our 
draft letter to the Board.  It is composed of a brief introductory letter, or 
executive summary, and a chart outlining each constituency and stakeholder 
position on whether there is agreement with each specific WHOIS Review Team 
Final Report recommendation and whether a Policy Development Process is 
required.  We have attached a .DOC version of the letter and chart to 
facilitate any final additions or amendments.

We look forward to expeditious consideration and approval by the Council, as 
well as delivery to the Board of Directors.

Thank you,


Brian J. Winterfeldt

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on 
behalf of Margie Milam[SMTP:MARGIE.MILAM@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:51:27 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart
Auto forwarded by a Rule

Dear All,

Please find attached final summary chart, clean and redlined, to reflect all of 
the input received to date.  Please note that the chart is missing any input 
from Registrars or the NCSG regarding whether they agree/disagree with each of 
the WHOIS RT recommendations.

All the best,

Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor

From: Margie Milam
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 1:58 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations- REMINDER FOR FINAL 

Dear All,

I just wanted to send a reminder on this, since I have only received comments 
from the IPC.

Please let me know by COB today whether your SG/C has any additional comments 
to the chart.

All the best,

From: Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:05 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations

Dear All,

As discussed last week,  I updated the draft WHOIS RT summary chart to include 
the clarifications requested by the ISP Constituency, and to include a column 
clarifying whether there was agreement with the substance of each 
recommendation, based upon the comments submitted in the Public Comment Forum 
(PCF) for the WHOIS Review Team Final Report.

In reviewing the 
 filed in the PCF, I did not locate submissions from each constituency/SG, 
making it difficult to complete the chart.   Notably missing were comments from 
Registrars, NCSG, or the IPC on the Final Report (although in some cases there 
were submissions on the draft report).   In addition, from the comments 
actually submitted,  it was not clear whether the commentators agreed/disagreed 
with the recommendation itself, since many of the comments appeared to address 
aspects of the recommendations, as opposed to evaluating the recommendation 

As a result,  it is important that each constituency/stakeholder group review 
the information contained in the attached chart, and indicate whether they 
agree/disagree with each of the recommendations.

Please provide this information by COB Monday, October 29, 2012, so that the 
chart can be finalized in advance of the Board's consideration of the WHOIS RT 
Final Report Recommendations.

All the best,



Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>