<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
Brian, and update on this? Alan
At 16/10/2012 10:16 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote:
Dear Alan ? thank you for your quick
feedback. I will circulate a new draft shortly
and be sure to include the additional
information as promised earlier as
appendices. I look forward to any additional feedback from the Council.
Best,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt
Partner
<mailto:bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steptoe
From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:18 AM
To: Winterfeldt, Brian; 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to
Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
Brian, several comments:
- does this imply that you will not be sending
any of the detailed breakdowns by SG/Const,
including the explanatory notes that
- the use of the term SG is confusing, as it
normally stands for Stakeholder Group in the GNSO context.
- Ignoring the possibly confusing abbreviation,
giving percentages of the SG without any
information about its constitution is not very informative.
- the reference to the GNSO's 6 constituencies
is unclear, as the GNSO has (I think!) five
constituencies in two Stakeholder Groups, and
two Stakeholder Groups without constituencies.
Alan
At 16/10/2012 01:46 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote:
Dear Councilors,
As was discussed in Saturday?s session with
regard to the WHOIS RT work, attached please
find a draft letter to the ICANN Board detailing
our various constituencies? recommendations as
to whether a PDP would be required for certain WHOIS enhancements.
We appreciate your prompt attention to this
matter and look forward to hearing your views so
that we may move forward as soon as possible
with providing our communication to the Board. Thank you.
Best regards,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|